Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

90
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
90
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

144
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
144
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

249
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
249
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

432
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
432

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The freedom to choose may be an artifact of a preference for spatial location.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Episodic memory: Rats can remember the context.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Episodic memory in animals?

Translational neuroscience·2025
Same author

Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Peter Urcuioli's lasting contribution: Animal memory research and an important model of stimulus class formation.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

Complex relationship between response rate and preference in pigeons: Williams (1992) revisited.

Learning & behavior·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

是什么让短暂的奖励任务如此困难?

Peyton M Mueller1, Daniel N Peng1, William C Burroughs1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)
|April 4, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

人类在短暂的奖励任务中扎,即使有延迟,也无法始终选择最佳选项. 这表明任务的复杂性,而不是冲动性,在这种情况下阻碍了人类的学习.

更多相关视频

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

704
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

704
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
  • 动物行为 动物行为

背景情况:

  • 短暂奖励任务提供了两个具有相同奖励的选项之间的选择.
  • 最佳策略包括首先选择B选项以最大限度地提高累积奖励,因为A选项仍然可用.
  • 非人类物种表现出不同程度的成功,一些动物掌握了任务,而灵长类动物,老鼠和子则扎.

研究的目的:

  • 为了研究人类在短暂奖励任务的操作版本上的表现.
  • 为了确定选择和奖励之间的短暂延迟对最佳决策的影响.
  • 探索人类任务执行和冲动性测量之间的关系.

主要方法:

  • 人类被训练在一个操作的短暂的奖励任务.
  • 这项研究包括了在选择和奖励之间有或没有短暂延迟的条件.
  • 绩效被评估并与冲动性指标相关联 (气球模拟风险任务,缩短冲动性调查).

主要成果:

  • 很大一部分人体未能学习最佳策略,无论延迟多久.
  • 任务表现与标准冲动性指标没有相关性.
  • 通过在选择和奖励之间引入延迟,没有促进最佳选择的获取.

结论:

  • 对人类来说,短暂的奖励任务的困难源于其模糊的强化结构 ("好"与"更好"的选择).
  • 冲动性似乎不是限制人类在这项任务上的最佳表现的主要因素.
  • 缺乏明确的"错误"反应使得学习和对优越策略的歧视变得复杂.