Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

71
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
71
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

1.6K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
1.6K
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

27
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
27

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Use of intraoperative vancomycin powder and its effects on the incidence of surgical site infection in orthopaedic trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same author

Joint analysis of dispersed count-time data using a bivariate latent factor model.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2025
Same author

Beta-Binomial Model for Count Data: An Application in Estimating Model-Based Oral Reading Fluency.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Equating Oral Reading Fluency Scores: A Model-Based Approach.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Penalized likelihood methods for modeling count data.

Journal of applied statistics·2023
Same author

Bias for Treatment Effect by Measurement Error in Pretest in ANCOVA Analysis.

Educational and psychological measurement·2022
Same journal

Proficiency order invariance of MLE, MAP, EAP, and WLE in item response theory.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Bias and precision in true-score estimation.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Polychoric correlations under the assumption of elliptical latent traits.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Regularized reduced rank regression for mixed predictor and response variables.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

A multiple-choice SDT model for cognitive diagnosis models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Modular item response and structural equation modelling via measurement and uncertainty preserving parametric modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

在口头阅读流度评分中纳入校准错误.

Xin Qiao1, Akihito Kamata2, Cornelis Potgieter3,4

  • 1University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
|May 10, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

口语阅读流性 (ORF) 评估中的校准错误可能会导致分数偏差. 对这些错误的计算为ORF得分提供了更准确的标准错误 (SE),特别是在较小的校准样本中.

关键词:
数计数据 数计数据 数计数据 数计数据项目响应理论是物品响应理论.测量时出现的测量误差口语阅读流性 流性响应时间响应时间

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

756
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

756
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.0K

科学领域:

  • 教育测量教育的测量
  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 阅读流性研究 阅读流性研究

背景情况:

  • 口头阅读流性 (ORF) 评估对于识别阅读困难的读者和评估教育干预措施至关重要.
  • 当前的评分方法通常将校准通道参数视为固定的,可能会忽视校准错误.
  • 未计入的校准错误可能导致偏差的ORF分数和低估的标准错误 (SE).

研究的目的:

  • 开发和评估一种用于将校准错误纳入ORF评估的潜在变量得分的方法.
  • 为了获得准确的SE,ORF得分可以考虑校准不确定性.
  • 在不同的条件下,评估校准错误对得分估计和SE的影响.

主要方法:

  • 使用了一种方法,将校准错误集成到隐性变量得分计算中.
  • 采用三角法来推导ORF得分的SE,明确包括校准不确定性.
  • 进行了模拟研究,以检查隐性变量和ORF分数的点估计和SE的恢复.

主要成果:

  • 忽视校准错误导致潜在变量得分和ORF得分都低估了SE.
  • 当校准样本规模较小时,对SE的低估更加明显.
  • 拟议的方法通过考虑校准不确定性来证明SE估计的准确性有所提高.

结论:

  • 在ORF评分中承认和纳入校准错误至关重要,以获得可靠的估计.
  • 低估SE可以对干预评估和读者选产生重大影响.
  • 未来的ORF评估开发应该优先考虑解决校准不确定性的方法,以提高得分精度.