Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

569
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
569
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

939
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
939
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting01:29

Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting

882
Documentation in long-term care facilities and home healthcare settings is crucial for ensuring continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for patients. Each setting has its specific documentation processes and tools:
Long-Term Care Facilities
882
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

1.1K
Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
1.1K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

895
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
895
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

1.0K
Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
1.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Safety and Feasibility of a "Fast-Track" Monitoring Protocol for Patients Treated With Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Curriculum Innovation: Clinical Documentation Integrity Education for Neurology Trainees.

The Neurohospitalist·2024
Same author

Numbers and Data.

Anesthesiology·2023
Same author

Rash, Facial Droop, and Multifocal Intracranial Stenosis Due to Varicella Zoster Virus Vasculitis.

The Neurohospitalist·2023
Same author

Reliability of the Telemedicine Examination in the Neurologic Diagnosis of Death.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2021

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.3K

优化神经科学死亡率:一种协作方法来改进文档.

Yasmin Aghajan1, Cheryl A Codner1, Patricia Martin1

  • 1Departments of Neurology (YA, BJM) and Department of Quality and Safety (CAC, PM, SP, RM, DLJ), Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Harvard Medical School (YA, BJM), Boston, MA.

Neurology. Clinical practice
|May 29, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

提高神经科学文档准确性显著增加了预期死亡率指数. 这种增强的评估反映了更好的护理质量,并影响了医院的排名和退款.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K
Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K
Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.2K

科学领域:

  • 医疗质量改善 改善医疗质量
  • 临床文档的完整性临床文档的完整性
  • 神经科学患者的结果.

背景情况:

  • 在神经科学中,准确记录患者的并发症对于确定预期死亡率至关重要.
  • 死亡率指数,即观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率的比率,受文档完整性的影响.
  • 优化死亡率指数有助于评估护理质量,改善服务线排名,并影响退款.

研究的目的:

  • 审查神经科学文档,并确定改进的机会.
  • 优化死亡率指数,以便更准确地评估护理质量.
  • 提高高急性神经科学患者预期死亡率计算的准确性.

主要方法:

  • 一个跨专业团队 (神经科医生,临床文档完整性专家) 在9个月内审查了70份死亡率图表.
  • 确定了高急性神经科学患者的常见文档缺陷.
  • 使用Vizient Inc.的风险调整方法,将预期的死亡率与审查前后进行了比较.

主要成果:

  • 在60%的图表中发现了改进文档的机会.
  • 报告不足的疾病包括吸气性肺炎,休克和脑病变.
  • 每名患者的平均影响死亡率的诊断数量显著增加 (4.3至7.8),预期死亡率从0.33上升至0.42 (p < 0.0001).

结论:

  • 医生和临床文档完整性专家的合作优化了预期死亡率计算.
  • 识别和解决特定于神经科学患者的文档缺口是关键.
  • 神经学家参与临床文档完整性对于改善神经学医生文档教育至关重要.