Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.9K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Impacts of physical and testimonial evidence on South Korean Police interrogator's selection of tactics.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2026
Same author

Assessing lying about opinions through extending the devil's advocate interview protocol with a same example statement.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset).

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Who Said What? The Effects of Cognitive Load on Source Monitoring and Memory for Multiple witnesses' Accounts.

Applied cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

All mouth and trousers? Use of the Devil's Advocate questioning protocol to determine authenticity of opinions about protester actions.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K

引入高上下文沟通风格的采访协议,以检测对对的欺骗.

Sharon Leal1, Aldert Vrij1, Tzachi Ashkenazi2

  • 1School of Psychology, Sport, & Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, PO1 2DY Hants, UK.

Acta psychologica
|August 21, 2024
PubMed
概括

一对讲真话的人可以通过使用高上下文的沟通线索来区分出骗子,特别是在个人采访期间提出意想不到的问题时. 观察者可以根据这些口头提示准确地检测出欺骗.

关键词:
欺骗 欺骗 欺骗 欺骗高上下文沟通的沟通方式.检测谎言的检测仪意想不到的问题接近.

更多相关视频

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

849

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

849

科学领域:

  • 心理学 心理学 心理学
  • 沟通研究 沟通研究
  • 法医科学 法医科学 法医科学

背景情况:

  • 在各种情况下,区分说实话者和说谎者至关重要.
  • 高语境的沟通,依赖于共同的理解,在真实和欺骗的对之间可能会有所不同.
  • 以前的研究已经探索了欺骗检测中的口头线索,但对双人高上下文通信知之甚少.

研究的目的:

  • 调查是否高上下文的沟通线索可以区分讲真话者和讲谎者.
  • 为了确定口头线索在二次相互作用中检测欺骗的有效性.
  • 评估问题类型 (预期与意外) 和面试格式 (个人与集体) 对欺骗检测准确性的影响.

主要方法:

  • 进行了四项实验,涉及两对个人 (朋友或假扮朋友的陌生人).
  • 参与者回答了预期和意想不到的问题,采访单独或集体进行.
  • 转录分析了特定的语言线索 (细节,并发症,可信性,可预测性,重叠,重复),观察者试图检测欺骗.

主要成果:

  • 当参与者被问到意想不到的问题时,口头暗示更容易诊断真实性.
  • 当对象被单独采访时,观察者在区分真相和谎言方面表现出更好的准确性,特别是在意想不到的问题上.
  • 高上下文的沟通风格,如口头暗示所示,在个人采访中更具揭示性.

结论:

  • 专注于意想不到的问题的个人采访更有效地检测使用高上下文沟通分析的双人欺骗.
  • 与高上下文沟通相关的口头线索为二极交互的真实性提供了有价值的见解.
  • 这项研究提供了一种新的欺骗检测方法,通过利用对中的沟通风格差异来进行欺骗检测.