Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Trapped in declining occupations: Barriers to worker mobility in a changing economy.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Disparate Effects of Disruptive Events on Children.

The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF·2025
Same author

Unequal effects of disruptive events.

Sociology compass·2024
Same author

Evaluating the Accuracy of 2020 Census Block-Level Estimates in California.

Demography·2023
Same author

Uncovering Sociological Effect Heterogeneity Using Tree-Based Machine Learning.

Sociological methodology·2023
Same author

Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty.

Nature human behaviour·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.2K

高等教育如何和为谁增加投票率?

Caitlin E Ahearn1, Jennie E Brand1, Xiang Zhou2

  • 1University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Research in higher education
|September 13, 2024
PubMed
概括

大学教育直接提高了投票的可能性,而不是像学位完成这样的间接途径. 大学的最大的公民影响有利于那些不太可能参加的学生,突出了更广泛的社会收益.

科学领域:

  • 社会学 社会学 社会学
  • 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
  • 经济学 经济学 经济学

背景情况:

  • 高等教育与增加选民投票率有关.
  • 现有的研究表明,通过大学影响投票的直接 (例如,参与) 和间接 (例如,社会经济地位) 途径.
  • 对这些路径及其个别变异的实证测试是有限的.

研究的目的:

  • 调查大学出勤对投票行为的直接和间接影响.
  • 分析这些影响如何在各个有不同大学入学倾向的个体之间有所不同.
  • 探索学位取得和社会经济地位在大学与投票关系中的作用.

主要方法:

  • 非参数的因果调解分析.
  • 利用了来自全国青年纵向调查 (1979年和1997年队列) 的纵向数据.
  • 研究了大学出勤对自我报告投票的总,直接和间接影响.

主要成果:

  • 大学出席率对投票产生了实质性的直接影响.
  • 通过学位完成和社会经济成就的间接影响相对较小.
  • 大学对投票的最大积极影响是观察到低倾向于上大学的个人,这是由直接影响驱动的.
  • 公民返回大学并不取决于学位完成或社会经济收益.
关键词:
因果调解是一种因果调解.学院学院学院学院的大学.异质性 异质性 异质性投票时间 投票时间

更多相关视频

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

977
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
07:29

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

8.2K
Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

977
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K

结论:

  • 直接途径,如增加政治兴趣和参与,是大学对投票的影响的主要驱动因素.
  • 高等教育的公民利益延伸到那些可能不会上大学的人.
  • 仅仅关注经济回报,忽视了扩大高等教育机会的重大社会优势,特别是不利的年轻人.