Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

134
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
134
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

86
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
86
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.1K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.1K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

11.8K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Statistical models for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Lessons learned from the DIAN-TU Platform Trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Likelihood ratio test for the disease progression model to measure saved time in Alzheimer's disease.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Adaptive sample size re-estimation designs for a two-stage randomized trial with binary outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor "Comments on 'Novel Non-Linear Models for Clinical Trial Analysis With Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial Using SAS for Both Frequentist and Bayesian Methods'".

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

On-site health service delivery models at syringe services programs in the United States: Results of a national cross-sectional survey.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: May 30, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

适应性前景区设计用于连续平行比较设计,具有连续的结果.

Xinlin Lu1, Guogen Shan1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Clinical trials (London, England)
|January 25, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

适应性策略,如样本大小调整,可以提高临床试验的效率. 有希望区方法提供更好的功率和更小的样本大小,尽管最大样本大小可能会增加. 分配比率的调整提供了有限的好处,但在特定情况下可以有所帮助.

关键词:
适应性设计适应性设计分配比率的修改.预期的样本大小 预期的样本大小避孕药效应对安慰剂的影响连续并行比较设计的设计.

更多相关视频

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626

科学领域:

  • 临床试验方法论 临床试验方法论
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 药学研究 药学研究

背景情况:

  • 顺序平行比较设计对于具有高安慰剂反应率的试验是有效的.
  • 适应性策略,包括样本大小和分配比率调整,可以提高试验效率.

研究的目的:

  • 为了将詹尼森和特恩布尔的方法与样本大小调整的有希望区方法进行比较.
  • 为了评估分配比率调整 (尼曼和最佳) 在自适应序列平行比较设计中的影响.
  • 评估各种设计参数对适应性策略的影响.

主要方法:

  • 模拟各种场景来评估样本大小调整方法 (詹尼森和特恩布尔与特恩布尔对比. 有希望的区域).
  • 使用尼曼和最佳策略评估分配比率调整.
  • 研究了测试统计数据中的重量,初始随机化比率和中间分析时间的影响.

主要成果:

  • "有前途的区域"方法在类似的预期样本大小下显示出优于或与詹尼森和特恩布尔的方法相比较的功率.
  • 有希望的区域方法直观地减少样本大小,有希望的中间结果,但可能会增加最大样本大小.
  • 分配比调整提供了微小的整体效益,但当治疗组的差异超过安慰剂组的差异时,显示出潜力.
  • 这些发现应用于AVP-923试验,用于与阿尔茨海默病相关的激动症.

结论:

  • 适应性策略显著提高了顺序并行比较设计的效率.
  • 对样本大小调整的方法选择需要平衡功率,预期和最大样本大小.
  • 分配比率调整的影响有限,但在特定情况下可能有用.
  • 未来的研究应该专注于对二元和生存结果的适应性策略.