Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.7K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

112
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
112
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

134
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
134

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Patient Versus Prediction-Level Evaluation of a Dynamic Clinical Prediction Model of Sepsis.

Research square·2026
Same author

Effect of Using Personalized Estimates of Diabetes Risk During Primary Care Visits for People With Prediabetes.

Learning health systems·2026
Same author

Patient Versus Prediction-Level Evaluation of a Dynamic Clinical Prediction Model of Sepsis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Mechanism Attribution After Cryptogenic Stroke: Toward a RoPE Score for Atrial Fibrillation Detected After Stroke.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Agreement and Prognostic Value of Clinically Interpreted CT vs MRI for Incidentally Discovered Covert Cerebrovascular Disease.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke and the PASCAL Classification System.

JAMA neurology·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

评估算法的公平性需要调整风险分配差异:重新考虑机会平等标准.

Sarah E Hegarty1, Kristin A Linn1, Hong Zhang2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
|February 20, 2025
PubMed
概括

算法公平度指标,如机会平等,可能会误导. 一个新的指标,调整后的真实阳性率 (aTPR),确保具有相似风险的个人有平等的机会来识别高风险,无论分组.

关键词:
算法的公平性 算法的公平性临床决策的过程机会平等 在机会平等方面.高风险的识别和识别.风险的分发风险的分配.

更多相关视频

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.2K

科学领域:

  • 计算机科学 计算机科学
  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 医疗保健分析 医疗保健分析

背景情况:

  • 算法辅助的决策需要强大的公平性评估.
  • 机会平等,一个共同的公平度量,依赖于跨子组的真正正率 (TPR) 平价.
  • 由于子组风险分布的变化,现有的指标可能会误解业绩差异.

研究的目的:

  • 引入一种新的公平度指标,即调整后的真正正比率 (aTPR),解决传统TPR的局限性.
  • 为了确保公平,评估会考虑人口子组之间的差异性风险分布.
  • 促进对具有相似潜在风险的个人平等待遇,不论他们属于哪个团体.

主要方法:

  • 通过将子组TPR与参考子组的风险分布进行规范化,开发了一个TPR指标.
  • 进行数值实验,分析各种差分校准场景下的性能.
  • 将aTPR指标应用于预测住院患者死亡风险的现实数据集.

主要成果:

  • 证明,当风险分布在子组之间不同时,标准的TPR可以产生误导性的公平性结论.
  • 展示了aTPR如何通过调整基线风险变化来提供更准确的公平性评估.
  • 使用aTPR指标,确定了在息治疗转诊预测中的潜在绩效差异.

结论:

  • 调整后的真正正比率 (aTPR) 为评估算法公平性提供了更可靠的方法,特别是在子组风险分布不同时.
  • 准确的公平评估对于在医疗保健和其他敏感领域公平部署算法至关重要.
  • 这项工作促进了更公平的风险预测和资源分配,例如及时的息护理咨询.