Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

6.9K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
6.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

80
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
80
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.0K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Reporting guidelines for single-case experimental design research: Recommendations for data analysis.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same author

Identifying common practice elements among consultation studies showing promising social and behavioral outcomes: A systematic review.

Journal of school psychology·2025
Same author

Academic and behavior combined support: A single-case practice-based replication study.

Journal of school psychology·2024
Same author

Assessing teachers' intervention-related expectations and self-efficacy: An examination of the factor structure of the implementation beliefs assessment.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Problem solving team interventions: Web-based and consultant-based experimental evaluations.

Journal of school psychology·2024
Same author

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities.

Reading and writing·2023
Same journal

A cluster randomized trial of a combined Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) classroom-based intervention.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Social-emotional learning and adolescent mental health: Indirect effects and the moderating role of peer victimization.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

From what is wrong to what is strong: Using tiered frameworks to identify early literacy strengths in Black preschool-age children.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

The development of a universal screening measure for young children: Assessing social and emotional competencies in early childhood.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Development of Arabic curriculum-based measurement for early literacy reading skills.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Flux and flow: Exploring the dynamic nature of acceptability in writing feedback.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 27, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.4K

在单个案例设计实验中的随机化:解决对内部有效性的威胁.

Thomas R Kratochwill1, Joel R Levin2

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)
|February 20, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

随机化增强了单个案例实验设计 (SCED),通过控制常常仅通过复制无法解决的有效性威胁. 这提高了SCED干预研究的研究可信度和统计分析.

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K

科学领域:

  • 心理学 心理学 心理学
  • 研究方法研究方法研究方法学
  • 行为科学 行为科学

背景情况:

  • 单个案例实验设计 (SCED) 对于评估干预措施至关重要.
  • 传统的SCED在很大程度上依赖于复制来确保内部有效性.
  • 即使在SCED中复制,内部有效性的威胁也可能持续存在.

研究的目的:

  • 审查和详细介绍适用于SCED方法的各种随机化策略.
  • 解释特定的随机化技术如何控制对内部有效性的威胁.
  • 在传统和非传统的SCED中证明随机化的实用性.

主要方法:

  • 对实验设计中的随机化现有文献的审查.
  • 随机化策略的分类:阶段顺序,干预之间,干预内部和起点随机化.
  • 将这些策略应用于各种SCED变异 (例如,ABAB,交替处理,多重基线) 和非复制设计.

主要成果:

  • 随机化提供了对内部有效性威胁的明确控制,复制无法完全解决这些威胁.
  • 具体的随机化方法详细介绍了不同的SCED结构.
  • 随机化提高了科学可信度,统计结论的有效性,以及在文献综合中包含的可能性.

结论:

  • 随机化是加强SCED内部有效性的重要工具.
  • 实施随机化增加了SCED研究的严谨性和统计能力.
  • 建议在SCED方法论中建立随机化标准.