Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Parenting Styles01:27

Parenting Styles

45
Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
45
Bullying02:04

Bullying

8.2K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.2K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

27.5K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
27.5K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.2K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

22.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same journal

Hope, Optimism, and Expectations for the Political Future.

Political behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Networks in Mobilization for Ethnic Minority Interest Parties.

Political behavior·2025
Same journal

Pushing and Pulling: The Static and Dynamic Effects of Political Distrust on Support for Representative Democracy and its Rivals.

Political behavior·2025
Same journal

Tilly versus Milward: Experimental Evidence of Public Preferences for European Defense Amidst the Russian Threat.

Political behavior·2025
Same journal

Narcissism and Affective Polarization.

Political behavior·2025
Same journal

Someone Like Me? Disability Identity and Representation Perceptions.

Political behavior·2025
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 12, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K

反对民主国家中的威权行为.

Sara B Hobolt1, Moritz Osnabrügge2

  • 1London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Political behavior
|May 8, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

批评专制候选人的政治家可能会降低他们的吸引力. 当批评来自同一党内时,这种效应更强烈,并且涉及大量成本,加强民主规范.

关键词:
威权主义的行为.候选人 候选人联合实验的实验是联合的.应对措施 应对措施民主党的倒退正在发生.

更多相关视频

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

17.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 12, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

17.5K

科学领域:

  • 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 民主稳定依赖于选民对民主规范的坚持.
  • 选民有时支持违反这些规范的政客,对民主构成威胁.

研究的目的:

  • 调查政治批评是否可以降低独裁政客的吸引力.
  • 为了确定政客们的昂贵行动是否更有效地抵制专制行为.

主要方法:

  • 进行了一项预先注册的联合实验.
  • 该实验是英国一项全国代表性调查的一部分.
  • 根据候选人的个人资料和立法者的批评,分析了选民的选择.

主要成果:

  • 当选民面临批评时,他们不太可能选择表现出专制行为的政治家.
  • 其他立法者的批评,特别是共党人的批评,大大减少了对独裁候选人的支持.
  • 当批评涉及批评政客的大量成本时,反击措施的有效性会增加.

结论:

  • 政治家可以在减轻独裁人物的选举成功方面发挥关键作用.
  • 同党派的批评是捍卫民主规范的有力工具.
  • 政治行动的成本影响了它们在塑造选民行为和维护民主方面的有效性.