Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

834
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
834
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

641
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
641
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

521
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
521
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

3.7K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.7K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.3K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.3K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.4K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

LncRNA MALAT1-miR-339-5p-NIS axis is involved in the increased level of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) induced by combined exposure of high iodine and hyperlipidemia.

The Journal of nutritional biochemistry·2024
Same author

Vaccination induces broadly neutralizing antibody precursors to HIV gp41.

Nature immunology·2024
Same author

Affinity gaps among B cells in germinal centers drive the selection of MPER precursors.

Nature immunology·2024
Same author

Dietary fiber may benefit chondrocyte activity maintenance.

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology·2024
Same author

Tumor-associated CD8<sup>+</sup>T cell tolerance induced by erythroid progenitor cells.

Frontiers in immunology·2024
Same author

Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Fermented and Water-Extracted Leaf Extracts of <i>Eucommia ulmoides</i> on Egg Production and Egg Nutrition.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.4K

使用半数据驱动的贝叶斯网络,为高速公路事故分析发现因果关系.

Yifan Wang1, Xuesong Wang1

  • 1College of Transportation, Tongji University, 201804, Shanghai, China; The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, 201804, Shanghai, China.

Accident; analysis and prevention
|August 8, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个新的基于专家知识约束 (EKC) 的算法增强了因果贝叶斯网络用于高速公路安全分析. 它通过整合专家知识,识别气候和交通等关键风险因素,提高了事故预测的解释性.

关键词:
贝叶斯网络是一个贝叶斯网络.因果关系是因果关系.专家知识 专家知识高速公路撞车分析分析模型的解释性 模型的解释性

更多相关视频

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.4K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.5K

科学领域:

  • 交通安全 交通安全
  • 机器学习 机器学习
  • 因果推理因果推理

背景情况:

  • 先进的机器学习技术在决策中缺乏可解释性.
  • 数据驱动的因果发现方法往往无法提供明确的解释.
  • 在交通安全等复杂领域需要透明模型.

研究的目的:

  • 提出一个半数据驱动的贝叶斯网络结构学习算法,即基于专家知识约束 (EKC) 的算法.
  • 在交通事故分析中提高因果关系发现的解释性.
  • 整合专家知识与数据,以获得更透明,更准确的因果模型.

主要方法:

  • 开发了基于限制的专家知识 (EKC) 算法,将专家知识与条件独立性测试集成在一起.
  • 将EKC算法应用于来自胡宁高速公路 (2022) 的高速公路撞车数据.
  • 利用贝叶斯估计和变量消除算法进行效果估计和场景排名.

主要成果:

  • 发现与日期相关的变量没有直接影响机.
  • 不利的温度,中等的交通量和雪天气与增加的撞车概率相关.
  • 在特定条件下发现的最高撞车概率:中等交通量,低温,冬天,多云天气,上午和周日.

结论:

  • 与登山,柳树和物流模型相比,EKC算法提供了更好的解释性,同时保持了强大的匹配分数.
  • 建立了交通事故分析中的模型解释性框架,包括因果关系,信任,异质性,可转移性和稳定性.
  • 该EKC算法提供了一个更加透明和可解释的方法来理解和减轻高速公路撞车风险.