Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

262
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
262
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

676
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
676
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

834
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
834
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

641
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
641
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

521
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
521

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Associations between women's childhood maltreatment and thyroid function before and during pregnancy.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sodium valproate induces pancreatic injury by disruption of one-carbon metabolism.

British journal of pharmacology·2026
Same author

Nonparametric Causal Inference for Optogenetics: Sequential Excursion Effects for Dynamic Regimes.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Early-life neighborhood resources and later-life cognitive function.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Prenatal and Early Postnatal Lead Exposure and Later Adulthood Cognitive Function in the St. Louis Baby Tooth-Later Life Health Study.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Semiparametric regression methods for temporal processes subject to multiple sources of censoring.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2026
Same journal

Debiased lasso after sample splitting for estimation and inference in high-dimensional generalized linear models.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2025
Same journal

Variable selection in modelling clustered data via within-cluster resampling.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2025
Same journal

Robust Estimation of Loss-Based Measures of Model Performance under Covariate Shift.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2024
Same journal

Optimal multiwave validation of secondary use data with outcome and exposure misclassification.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2024
Same journal

Smoothed model-assisted small area estimation of proportions.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2024
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

对于缺少混因子的点暴露,进行了强大的因果推断.

Alexander W Levis1, Rajarshi Mukherjee2, Rui Wang2,3

  • 1Department of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique
|August 11, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一种新方法,可以在缺乏数据的队列研究中准确估计因果关系. 强大的估计器同时处理混和缺失,提高因果推理可靠性.

关键词:
因果推理的原因推理.初级 62G2020 的情况.二级 62G3535 中级缺失的数据 缺失的数据多倍强壮的强壮的强大.半参数理论 半参数理论

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
09:50

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Published on: February 12, 2015

11.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
09:50

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Published on: February 12, 2015

11.3K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 流行病学 流行病学

背景情况:

  • 观察性研究经常遇到缺失的数据,使因果推断复杂化.
  • 现有的因果推理方法往往难以同时解决混和缺失问题.
  • 需要强大的统计方法来应对这些挑战在现实世界的数据.

研究的目的:

  • 在队列研究中开发一种高效且可靠的因果平均治疗效果估计器.
  • 解决因果推理中混和缺失数据的交集问题.
  • 提供一种可靠的方法来分析缺少混因子的观测数据.

主要方法:

  • 为高效估计提出了一种新的概率因子化方法.
  • 启用了使用机器学习的麻烦函数的灵活建模.
  • 开发了一个因果平均治疗效果的估计器,随机缺失混因子.

主要成果:

  • 拟议的估计器通过模拟在有限样本中证明了稳定性.
  • 该方法促进了复杂关系的灵活建模.
  • 为最终估计者实现了名义收率.

结论:

  • 这种新的方法提供了一种高效和强大的方法,用于在缺少数据的情况下进行因果推理.
  • 这个估计器可以作为评估其他方法的基准.
  • 适用于队列研究和电子健康记录数据分析.