Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

86
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
86
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Development and validation of the dyslexia assessment and intervention scale to measure dyslexia knowledge.

Annals of dyslexia·2026
Same author

Informing Intervention: An Exploration of Behavioral and Social-Emotional IEP Goals for Students with ASD.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Proteins in the Genome Browser: Integration of Phylogenies, Alignments, and Structures With Nucleotide-level Evidence in JBrowse 2.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

Setting up JBrowse 2 for Visualizing Genome Synteny.

Current protocols·2025
Same author

Causal Pathways to Risk and Protective Factors for Partial-Day School Absenteeism for Secondary School Students.

Journal of adolescence·2025
Same author

Toward a Consensus Model of Cognitive-Reading Achievement Relations Using Meta-Structural Equation Modeling.

Journal of Intelligence·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909

SLD模型和评估数据来源:对识别和信心的影响

Kathrin E Maki1, Courtenay A Barrett2, Matthew K Burns1

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Journal of learning disabilities
|August 23, 2025
PubMed
概括

特定学习障碍 (SLD) 识别模型没有影响识别决策或信心. 然而,参与者的种族影响了决策,而种族,认证和经验影响了识别SLD的信心.

科学领域:

  • 教育心理学
  • 特殊教育
  • 心理测量

背景情况:

  • 特定学习障碍 (SLD) 的识别依赖于各种模型.
  • 了解不同模式如何影响识别决策和信心对于公平实践至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 调查SLD识别模型 (能力与成就的差异,对干预的反应,强项和弱项的模式) 与识别决策之间的关联.
  • 检查这些模型对决策信心的影响以及评估数据的感知重要性.

主要方法:

  • 264名参与者阅读了心理教育评估报告.
  • 参与者被随机分配到三个SLD识别模型条件之一 (Ab-Ach,RtI,PSW).
  • 分析的数据包括识别决策,信心水平和评估数据的感知重要性.

主要成果:

  • 该SLD识别模型没有预测识别决策或信心.
  • 参与者的种族与SLD识别决定有关.
  • 参与者的种族,国家认证和经验影响了决策的信心.

结论:

  • 选择SLD识别模型并没有显著改变识别结果或信心.
关键词:
标识 SLD 的基于数据的决策强项和弱项的模式对干预的反应特殊的学习障碍

更多相关视频

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.4K
  • 人口因素如种族,以及职业经验,在SLD识别决策和信心中起作用.
  • 学校心理学家认为进步监测,标准化测试和教育记录是关键数据来源.