Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

1.9K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.9K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Examining the Potential Benefits of Affirming Values on Memory for Educational Information.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Are you sure? Examining the potential benefits of truth-checking as a learning activity.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

Remembering what to do when the time comes: The effects of offloading in a complex prospective memory task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2022
Same author

Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Psychological research·2021
Same author

A little can go a long way: giving learners some context can enhance the benefits of pretesting.

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same author

Pretesting can be beneficial even when using the internet to answer questions.

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same journal

An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Physical Activity, Social Support, and Life Satisfaction Among Female College Students: A Variable- and Person-Centered Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Shifting the Blame: How Narrative Framing, Coercive Strategies, and Rape Myth Acceptance Distort Perceptions of Sexual Assault and Fuel Victim Blame.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

471

对不起,我是在打扰吗? 测试前和测试后信息的性能和入侵率的比较

Kelsey K James1, Benjamin C Storm2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Houston Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 28, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

前测试和后测试都有助于学习,但前测试比后测试更有效地减少虚假信息的入侵. 即使有反, 后测试导致更多的错误信息被召回.

关键词:
一个错误学习方式预先测试测试消极的暗示效应预测的效果测试效果真实/虚假测试

更多相关视频

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.6K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

471
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.6K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

科学领域:

  • 教育心理学
  • 认知科学
  • 学习科学

背景情况:

  • 预测和后测是评估和增强学习的常见课堂工具.
  • 现有研究对预测与后测的比较好处是不确定的.
  • 经常使用真假测试,但它们对学习的影响,特别是虚假信息的回忆,还不清楚.

研究的目的:

  • 研究真假预测和后测对学习正确信息的影响.
  • 检查预测和后测如何影响虚假信息的入侵率.
  • 为了比较预测和后测的有效性,尽量减少虚假信息的回忆.

主要方法:

  • 使用真假测试进行了三项实验,以评估学习结果.
  • 参与者完成了前测试和后测试以评估知识获取和记忆.
  • 错误信息的入侵率与正确信息的回忆率一起测量.

主要成果:

  • 测试前和测试后都显示了学习正确信息的持续益处.
  • 与前期测试相比,后期测试导致错误信息的入侵率显著增加.
  • 虽然实质性反减少了虚假信息的入侵,但测试前和测试后入侵率之间的差异仍然很大.

结论:

  • 在防止虚假信息回忆方面,预测似乎比后测更有效.
  • 虽然反机制可以减轻虚假信息的回忆,但预测在减少入侵方面具有明显的优势.
  • 教育策略应考虑测试前和测试后对准确和不准确记忆的差异影响.