在FBG传感器网络中分离扭曲的重叠光谱,使用自主监督的对比学习
Optics express
|November 11, 2025
概括
本研究介绍了一种对比的频谱分离模型 (CSSM),用于解决纤维布拉格格 (FBG) 传感器网络中重叠的光谱. CSSM显著提高了结构健康监测的应变测量准确性.
科学领域:
- 光学工程是指光学工程.
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
- 人工智能的人工智能
背景情况:
- 纤维布拉格格网 (FBG) 传感器网络面临着光谱重叠和扭曲的挑战,特别是在复合结构中的残余应变监测等应用中.
- 这些光谱问题限制了FBG网络的复杂化能力和传感精度,阻碍了它们在复杂环境中的有效性.
研究的目的:
- 提出和验证一种自我监督的学习框架,即对比频谱分离模型 (CSSM),用于有效地分离FBG传感器网络中的扭曲和重叠的频谱.
- 在具有非均物理场的场景中增强FBG传感器网络的精度和复杂化能力.
主要方法:
- 开发了一种使用双编码器架构与并行卷积神经网络的对比频谱分离模型 (CSSM).
- 采用自主监督学习方法,从扭曲的光谱中直接提取特征,最大限度地减少对广泛标记训练数据的需求.
- 通过模拟和实验测量在不同的光谱重叠和噪声条件下验证模型,包括应变梯度.
主要成果:
- 在15dB的噪音水平下,CSSM表现出卓越的稳定性,实现了54.5%的信号噪声比 (SNR) 改进.
- 模拟结果显示,在波长检测 (1.6388 pm) 和分离光谱的光谱相似性 (0.9074) 中,波长检测的准确性很高.
- 使用高达-650 μm/mm的应变梯度进行实验验证,使应变测量误差从±37.2 μm降低到约1.35 μm.
结论:
- CSSM框架有效地将FBG传感器网络中的扭曲重叠光谱分离出来,克服了当前方法的局限性.
- 该模型显著提高了FBG传感器的精度和复杂化能力,证明了在现实世界结构健康监测中的实际有效性.
- 这一进步使得使用FBG传感器技术对复合结构和其他复杂系统进行更可靠的监控.
更多相关视频
07:34Excitation-Scanning Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy to Efficiently Discriminate Fluorescence Signals
Published on: August 22, 2019
8.4K
08:49Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Potential of VSFG Microscopy in Studying Mesoscopically Heterogeneous Self-Assembled Structures
Published on: December 1, 2023
2.0K
相关概念视频
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
1.5K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.5K
Aliasing
534
Accurate signal sampling and reconstruction are crucial in various signal-processing applications. A time-domain signal's spectrum can be revealed using its Fourier transform. When this signal is sampled at a specific frequency, it results in multiple scaled replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain. The spacing of these replicas is determined by the sampling frequency.
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
534
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
1.7K
Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...
1.7K
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region
1.8K
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
1.8K
Classification of Signals
1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K
