Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.3K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.3K
Models, Theories, and Laws01:16

Models, Theories, and Laws

9.4K
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
9.4K
Concepts and Prototypes01:24

Concepts and Prototypes

592
The human nervous system handles vast amounts of information by translating sensory stimuli into neural impulses, which the brain processes, creating thoughts expressed through language or stored as memories. The brain also synthesizes information from emotions and memories, which significantly influence thoughts and behaviors. This intricate process creates a comprehensive mental picture.
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
592
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Toward Biomarker Discovery for Early Cerebral Palsy Detection: Evaluating Explanations Through Kinematic Perturbations.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Diagnosing migraine from genome-wide genotype data: a machine learning analysis.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Explaining Human Activity Recognition with SHAP: Validating insights with perturbation and quantitative measures.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Information based explanation methods for deep learning agents-with applications on large open-source chess models.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Artificial intelligence and headache.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2024
Same author

Visual explanations for polyp detection: How medical doctors assess intrinsic versus extrinsic explanations.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Structural impact of non-IID heterogeneity on federated behavioral anomaly detection in IoT and IoMT systems.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

DiscoVerse: multi-agent pharmaceutical co-scientist for traceable drug discovery and reverse translation.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

EEG-based cognition-aware task classification and scheduling using enhanced fuzzy transition modeling.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Autofluorescence and deep learning in early disease detection: biological foundations, clinical applications, and future directions.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Legal document summarization: a short review.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Generative AI adoption and its impact on teachers' self-efficacy and instructional confidence in Ghana.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K

一个基于因果概念的模型解释的框架.

Anna Rodum Bjøru1, Jacob Lysnæs-Larsen1, Oskar Jørgensen1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence
|February 27, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究引入了可解释AI (XAI) 的因果框架,为复杂模型创建可理解和可信的解释. 它使用概念干预来产生本地和全球的见解,确保清晰度和准确性.

关键词:
因果解释的原因解释.概念归属 概念归属反事实性的解释.在后期的XAIAI中.足够性的概率.

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K

科学领域:

  • 人工智能的人工智能
  • 机器学习 机器学习
  • 因果推理因果推理

背景情况:

  • 非可解释的人工智能模型对理解它们的决策过程提出了挑战.
  • 后期可解释的人工智能 (XAI) 方法旨在提供对黑子模型的见解.
  • 现有的XAI方法可能缺乏足够的忠实性或可理解性.

研究的目的:

  • 提出基于因果关系概念的临时后期XAI的概念框架.
  • 确保解释既可理解又忠于底层AI模型.
  • 通过概念干预生成本地和全球解释.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一个基于因果概念的XAI的概念框架.
  • 计算了概念干预产生解释的足够性概率.
  • 使用了在CelebA数据集上训练的概念验证模型进行演示.

主要成果:

  • 以概念干预为基础生成示例本地和全球解释.
  • 通过清晰,因果解释的概念词汇来证明可理解性.
  • 通过概述框架假设和上下文调整的重要性来解决忠实性.

结论:

  • 拟议的框架提供了一种在XAI.中创建可理解和可信的解释的方法.
  • 因果概念干预提供了一个强大的机制,用于产生本地和全球的见解.
  • 将解释上下文与生成上下文对齐对于可靠的XAI至关重要.