[Phototherapy in severe atopic dermatitis. Comparison between current UVA1 therapy, UVA1 cold light and combined...

Severe atopic dermatitis, especially when involving the face, does not respond well to conventional therapy. In the present prospective randomized trial, we compared therapeutic efficiency of medium-dose UVA1, medium-dose cold light UVA1 (15 treatment courses with 50 J/cm2 each) and combined UVA-UVB phototherapy. Four (13.3%) of 30 UVA1 treated patients, one (3.4%) of 30 UVA1 cold light treated patients and three (30%) of 10 patients treated with combined UVA-UVB discontinued therapy course before finishing treatment protocol because skin status did not improve or even deteriorated. In the other patients treated over a period of three weeks, skin status improved significantly or even cleared completely in 80.8% of UVA1 treated and in 89.7% of UVA1 cold light treated patients resulting in a significant decrease of the SCORAD-Score (UVA1 group from 68.6 +/- SD 10.9 to 29.8 +/- SD 7.1 and UVA1 cold light group from 72.5 +/- SD 13.4 to 23.8 +/- SD 11.6; p < 0.05 each). In the UVA-UVB treated group, the SCORAD-Score also decreased (from 71.0 +/- SD 9.4 to 41.6 +/- 10.5), but significantly less than in both UVA1 treated groups (p < 0.05 each). Four weeks after completing therapy UVA1 treated patients showed a prolonged therapy benefit as compared to UVA-UVB treated patients. Plasma levels of eosinophil cationic protein and soluble interleukin-2 receptor significantly decreased under UVA1 phototherapy but not under UVA-UVB therapy. Compared to conventional UVA1 phototherapy, UVA1 cold light phototherapy showed advantages due to the absence of potentially proinflammatory effects based on temperature-induced increase of skin blood flow (quantified by Laser doppler scanning) and increased sweat production (determined by the patient using a visual analog scale).