Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychopathology: description and classification.

P E Nathan1, J W Langenbucher

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA. peter-nathan@uiowa.edu

Annual Review of Psychology
|March 13, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deny nothing, doubt everything: a comment on Westen and Morrison (2001).

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2002
Same author

Assessment of alcohol tolerance in adolescents.

Journal of studies on alcohol·2001
Same author

Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers.

Neuropsychologia·2001
Same author

Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: between Scylla and Charybdis?

Psychological bulletin·2000
Same author

Diagnostic concordance of DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol diagnoses in adolescents.

Journal of studies on alcohol·2000
Same author

Cerebellar hypoactivity in frequent marijuana users.

Neuroreport·2000
Same journal

Implicit Bias: Evolution of a Powerful Idea.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Social Robotics Is Not (Just) About Machines, It Is About People: Psychology's Role in Developing Social Machines.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Intensive Longitudinal Methods: Toward a Psychological Science of Daily Life.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Space to Act, Think, and Create.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Dense Phenotyping of Human Brain Network Organization Using Precision fMRI.

Annual review of psychology·2025
See all related articles

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) shows good reliability and validity, but some disorders like schizophrenia and personality disorders still need improvement. Dimensional approaches show promise but require more research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Psychological diagnostics
  • Mental health research

Background:

  • The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) is a widely used diagnostic system.
  • Its empirical foundation has led to improvements in reliability and validity.
  • However, challenges remain in diagnosing certain mental health conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of the DSM-IV.
  • To examine the diagnostic challenges associated with specific mental health disorders.
  • To explore the implications of comorbidity and the potential of dimensional diagnostic approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of empirical research on DSM-IV reliability and validity.
  • Analysis of studies validating diagnostic criteria using neurobiological, genetic-familial, and trait-based models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of research on the comorbidity of mental disorders.
  • Conceptual evaluation of dimensional versus syndromal diagnostic systems.
  • Main Results:

    • DSM-IV demonstrates good to excellent reliability and improved validity overall.
    • Reliability remains problematic for schizophrenic spectrum, personality, and some childhood/adolescent disorders.
    • Diagnostic validity shows mixed results: modest success with neurobiological validators for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but success with trait models for depressive and anxiety disorders.
    • High comorbidity is noted for substance-related disorders, personality disorders, depression, and anxiety.
    • Dimensional approaches show conceptual advantages but require further empirical investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • While DSM-IV has strengths, specific diagnostic categories require further refinement.
    • Comorbidity presents significant challenges and adverse consequences in clinical practice.
    • Dimensional diagnostic systems offer a promising alternative but need more empirical validation before widespread adoption.