Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychotherapy research: basic or applied?

L E Beutler1, M P Karno

  • 1Counseling/Clinical/School Psychology Program, Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|April 1, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Substance use disorders and treatment utilization among MDMA users: Results from The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Journal of drug issues·2013
Same author

Hearing-loss effects on a procedural task sequence.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The role of activation in the effect of total sleep deprivation on depressed mood.

Journal of clinical psychology·2003
Same author

Thought Field Therapy: initial research.

Journal of clinical psychology·2001
Same author

Commentary on Greene and Ablon: What does the MTA study tell us about effective psychosocial treatment for ADHD?

Journal of clinical child psychology·2001
Same author

Comparisons among quality assurance systems: from outcome assessment to clinical utility.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2001

Redefining psychotherapy outcome research as basic science may not guarantee progress. Integrating diverse research methods, including N=1 and clinical utility, is crucial for understanding treatment effectiveness and change mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research

Background:

  • Borkovec and Miranda (1996) proposed redefining psychotherapy outcome research as basic research to advance interventions.
  • This reconceptualization was expected to promote dismantling, parametric, and additive research strategies and foster collaboration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To question the assumptions that redefining research will enhance collaboration and clarify causal mechanisms.
  • To examine whether randomization and group designs inherently yield valid cause-effect assessments.
  • To illustrate how theory-guided clinical research can elucidate within-therapy and within-patient causal factors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a randomized clinical trials study.
  • Application of theoretical guidance to clinical research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integration of multiple research paradigms (N=1, clinical utility, controlled research).

    • Main Results:

    • The study questions the inherent benefits of randomization and group designs for causal inference.
    • It demonstrates how theory can guide research to identify causal relationships within therapy and patient variables.
    • A combination of research approaches is suggested as optimal for answering key questions.

    Conclusions:

    • A simple reconceptualization of psychotherapy research is insufficient to address complex issues.
    • Integrating diverse research paradigms is essential for advancing the understanding of treatment effectiveness and change mechanisms.
    • The study underscores the importance of theory-driven research in clinical psychology.