Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A consensus model for group purchasing.

L A Dickson1

  • 1Sisters of Providence Health Care Corporation, Seattle, WA.

Radiology Management
|January 4, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sisters of Providence employs a group consensus model for major capital technology acquisitions. This model integrates six clinical and administrative viewpoints for diagnostic imaging equipment decisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A decrease in glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and mRNA is an early event in phorbol ester-induced differentiation of thp-1 promonocytic leukemia cells.

Life sciences·1996
Same author

Phorbol myristate acetate-differentiated THP-1 cells display increased levels of MHC class I and class II mRNA and interferon-gamma-inducible tumoricidal activity.

Oncology research·1993
Same author

Rat cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P-450scc): use of a cDNA probe to study the hormonal regulation of P-450scc mRNA levels in ovarian granulosa cells.

Gene·1987
Same author

Analysis of the promoter region and the N-propeptide domain of the human pro alpha 2(I) collagen gene.

Nucleic acids research·1985
Same author

DNA polymorphisms in collagen genes: potential use in the study of disease.

Progress in clinical and biological research·1985
Same author

Osteogenesis imperfecta: cloning of a pro-alpha 2(I) collagen gene with a frameshift mutation.

The Journal of biological chemistry·1984
Same journal

The Diagnostic Imagination in Radiology: Part 2.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Enhancing Patient Safety Using Medical Imaging Informatics.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Leading and Motivating Generation Y Employees.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Accounting Basics Part 4: Net Present Value.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Employee Incentives in Healthcare: An Eight Year Comparison.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Current Employment Practices and Future Preferences for Multicredentialed Technologists in Nebraska.

Radiology management·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Administration
  • Medical Technology Management
  • Health Systems Engineering

Background:

  • Major capital items, particularly in diagnostic imaging, require significant financial investment and strategic planning.
  • Effective acquisition and implementation processes are crucial for optimizing healthcare technology and patient care.
  • The Sisters of Providence healthcare system sought a structured approach to technology assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the group consensus model used by Sisters of Providence for major capital item acquisition.
  • To detail the integration of diverse perspectives in technology acquisition for diagnostic imaging.
  • To outline the practical steps involved in the consensus-based decision-making process.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines a group consensus model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Six distinct clinical and administrative perspectives are incorporated.
  • The model focuses on the assessment of technology acquisitions for diagnostic imaging.

    • Main Results:

    • The consensus model systematically incorporates multiple stakeholder viewpoints.
    • This approach ensures comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic imaging technology.
    • Mr. Dickson provides a detailed procedural outline of the model.

    Conclusions:

    • Group consensus models offer a robust framework for complex healthcare technology acquisitions.
    • Integrating clinical and administrative insights enhances strategic decision-making in capital investments.
    • The described model provides a replicable strategy for health systems.