Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reduction of errors in laboratory test reports using continuous quality improvement techniques.

J Banning1, J Brown, L Hooper

  • 1Westmead Hospital, Australia.

Clinical Laboratory Management Review : Official Publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association
|August 6, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ECB renal patient questionnaire: an assessment tool to determine renal patients' needs for immediate social work intervention.

Advances in renal replacement therapy·2000
Same author

Learning disabilities. Adapt and survive.

Nursing times·1992
Same author

Intracellular regulation of cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components in murine B16 melanoma cells.

Melanoma research·1992
Same author

The effect of chewing gum use on in situ enamel lesion remineralization.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

Pick's disease.

Bailliere's clinical neurology·1992
Same author

A prospective cytogenetic study of 36 cases of DiGeorge syndrome.

American journal of human genetics·1992
Same journal

What is your return on your skills investment?

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

As we see it. Outreach.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

Dollar$ & $en$e. Part III: Measuring added value.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

When a health-care plan does not cover an ordered test.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

Career development strategies. The psycho-barbarian manager.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

The use of the Delphi panel for consensus development on indicators of laboratory performance.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
See all related articles

Continuous quality improvement significantly reduced wrongly addressed clinical laboratory reports by 17-fold. This process enhancement improved turnaround times without additional costs or system changes.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Incorrectly addressed clinical laboratory test reports pose a significant challenge in healthcare delivery.
  • Ensuring accurate report distribution is crucial for patient safety and effective medical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodologies to reduce errors in clinical laboratory test report addressing.
  • To identify and eliminate the root causes of wrongly addressed laboratory reports.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized flow charting to map the test report production process over a 6-month period.
  • Quantified error rates associated with incorrectly addressed reports.
  • Systematically identified and addressed the root causes of these addressing errors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Achieved a 17-fold sustained reduction in the rate of incorrectly addressed clinical laboratory test reports.
  • Observed improvements in report turnaround time.
  • No significant financial investment or changes to staff, equipment, or the laboratory information system were required.

Conclusions:

  • Continuous quality improvement is a highly effective strategy for minimizing errors in clinical laboratory report distribution.
  • Process optimization can lead to substantial improvements in accuracy and efficiency within clinical laboratories.
  • The implemented CQI approach demonstrated a significant positive impact without necessitating resource-intensive changes.