Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

What's wrong with this picture?

S J Hage

    Radiology Management
    |December 4, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Government economic analysis, particularly for healthcare reform, relies on outdated 1930s methods. This "rear-view mirror" approach hinders accurate assessment of 21st-century economic output and progress.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Three-Card Monte and pigs wearing earrings.

    Radiology management·2000
    Same author

    Look what we've become.

    Radiology management·1999
    Same author

    Worried about Y2K?

    Radiology management·1999
    Same author

    Time for reckoning ... Wall Street wasn't interested in healthcare because it had not yet become big business.

    Radiology management·1999
    Same author

    What used to be easy is hard.

    Radiology management·1998
    Same author

    Hard lessons and tough problems.

    Radiology management·1998
    Same journal

    The Diagnostic Imagination in Radiology: Part 2.

    Radiology management·2019
    Same journal

    Enhancing Patient Safety Using Medical Imaging Informatics.

    Radiology management·2019
    Same journal

    Leading and Motivating Generation Y Employees.

    Radiology management·2019
    Same journal

    Accounting Basics Part 4: Net Present Value.

    Radiology management·2019
    Same journal

    Employee Incentives in Healthcare: An Eight Year Comparison.

    Radiology management·2019
    Same journal

    Current Employment Practices and Future Preferences for Multicredentialed Technologists in Nebraska.

    Radiology management·2019
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Economic Policy

    Background:

    • Current healthcare reform debates utilize economic data.
    • Existing economic measurement methods may be outdated.
    • Concerns exist regarding the relevance of historical economic analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the inadequacy of 1930s economic measurement techniques for contemporary issues.
    • To critique the reliance on antiquated economic data in healthcare reform discussions.
    • To advocate for modernized economic analysis in policy-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of economic measurement principles.
    • Critique of historical economic data application in current policy.
    • Comparative assessment of 1930s vs. 21st-century economic contexts.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Economic output measurement methods from the 1930s persist.
    • Antiquated economic data is influencing current healthcare reform debates.
    • There is a significant disconnect between historical analysis and modern economic realities.

    Conclusions:

    • The continued use of 1930s economic measurement frameworks is problematic.
    • Modern healthcare reform requires updated and relevant economic data analysis.
    • A shift towards contemporary economic assessment is crucial for effective policy.