Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive

G S Halford1, W H Wilson, S Phillips

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. gsh@psy.uq.oz.au

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|April 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors affecting the efficacy of human leukocyte antigen-selected platelet provision: A large retrospective study in the United Kingdom.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Follow-up post-HCV virological response to DAA in advanced chronic liver disease.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver·2024
Same author

Cannabis smoking and abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Pedi-R-MAPP | the development, testing, validation, and refinement of a digital nutrition awareness tool.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2023
Same author

Development, design and experience of the UK Military's return to diving pathway following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BMJ military health·2022
Same author

Application of biomimetic surfaces and 3D culture technology to study the role of extracellular matrix interactions in neurite outgrowth and inhibition.

Biomaterials advances·2022
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Working memory capacity is limited by the complexity of relations processed in parallel. More complex concepts are managed through segmentation or conceptual chunking, impacting cognitive load and development.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Working memory capacity is a fundamental aspect of cognition.
  • Previous research has explored various limits on working memory, but a unified framework is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define working memory limits in terms of relational complexity.
  • To explore the mechanisms of handling complex information within working memory.
  • To investigate the implications for cognitive development and computational models.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of relational complexity.
  • Review of experimental findings on working memory limits.
  • Examination of neural network models of relational representations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Working memory limits are best defined by the complexity of relations processed in parallel, specifically the number of related dimensions.
  • A soft limit exists for processing one quaternary relation in parallel.
  • Complex concepts are processed via segmentation (serial processing) or conceptual chunking (dimensionality reduction).
  • Neural net models confirm that increased relational arguments correlate with higher computational costs, aligning with human processing load findings.

Conclusions:

  • Relational complexity provides a unifying framework for understanding working memory limits across species and development.
  • The findings have implications for computational cognitive models and theories of cognitive development.
  • Age-related increases in relational complexity processing in children are observed.