Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Unanticipated outcomes: dental implants.

J E Lemons1

  • 1Department of Biomaterials, UAB Schools of Dentistry and Medicine, USA. jack.lemons@ortho.uab.edu

Implant Dentistry
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Particle Abrasion Media and Pressure on Flexural Strength and Bond Strength of Zirconia.

Operative dentistry·2022
Same author

Ceramics in orthopedic surgery.

Surgical technology international·2015
Same author

Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2010
Same author

Medical devices, health care, and consensus standards.

Standardization news : SN·2002
Same author

Strength analysis of Le Fort I osteotomy fixation: titanium versus resorbable plates.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2001
Same author

Analysis of Ti-6Al-4V implants placed with fibroblast growth factor 1 in rat tibiae.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2001
Same journal

Fifteen-Year Follow-up of Short Dental Implants in the Completely Edentulous Jaw: Submerged Versus Nonsubmerged Healing.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Effect of 5 Popular Disinfection Methods on Microflora of Laboratory: Customized Implant Abutments.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Implant Specialization: A Logical Progression or a Quagmire?

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Indirect Sinus Augmentation With and Without the Addition of a Biomaterial: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

2019 Concluding Editorial.

Implant dentistry·2019
Same journal

Chemical Stability and Antimicrobial Activity of Plasma-Sprayed Cerium Oxide-Incorporated Calcium Silicate Coating in Dental Implants.

Implant dentistry·2019
See all related articles

Dental implants show success in restorative systems. Ceramic coatings on endosteal implants offer specific advantages and disadvantages, analyzed over various in-vivo timeframes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Musculoskeletal Restorative Systems

Background:

  • Dental implant treatments are largely successful within musculoskeletal restorative systems.
  • A variety of metallic and ceramic biomaterials, implant body designs, transgingival abutments, and intraoral crowns are available.
  • Failure analysis of explanted dental devices requires comprehensive data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze dental implant systems, focusing on those with and without calcium phosphate ceramic coatings on the endosteal portion.
  • To evaluate the performance of these dental implant systems at different in-vivo time intervals: 0-1, 1-5, 5-10, and beyond 10 years.
  • To provide opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of ceramic-coated dental implant systems.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of approximately 4000 musculoskeletal implant device studies conducted between 1970 and 1997.
  • Subset analysis of dental implant systems, specifically comparing those with and without endosteal calcium phosphate ceramic coatings.
  • In-vivo observation and data collection over extended periods.

Main Results:

  • Dental implant systems demonstrate varying degrees of success across different in-vivo timeframes.
  • Ceramic coatings on the endosteal portion of implants present distinct benefits and drawbacks.
  • Long-term performance data is crucial for understanding implant survival rates and failure modes.

Conclusions:

  • Dental surgical implant treatments are generally successful, but material choice and design are critical factors.
  • Calcium phosphate ceramic coatings on endosteal dental implants have specific advantages and disadvantages that influence long-term outcomes.
  • Comprehensive failure analysis, considering extensive in-vivo data, is essential for advancing dental implant technology.