Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling modeling.

P R Killeen1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA. Killeen@asu.edu

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|April 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Models are evaluated by their utility and complexity. Their value depends on the phenomena they explain versus the effort required to use them, with no definitive evaluation yet for MTS models challenging SET.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychophysics: Plus ça change ….

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Foraging by rats: Intuitions, models, data.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Changing rates of reinforcement perturbs the flow of time.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

A clock not wound runs down.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Frustration: Theory and practice.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.

Psychopharmacology·2012
Same journal

The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific modeling and theoretical frameworks.
  • Evaluation of scientific models.

Background:

  • Models serve as tools, requiring evaluation based on their suitability for specific tasks and contexts.
  • The presence or absence of specific features within a model is not inherently positive or negative.

Discussion:

  • Model evaluation criteria involve a benefit-cost ratio, considering explanatory power, fit, consistency, and aesthetic qualities.
  • The cost component includes model complexity, the number of ignored phenomena, and the effort for integration into scientific discourse.
  • These evaluation metrics are currently difficult to apply to Model Testing Systems (MTS).

Key Insights:

  • The benefit of a model is determined by its explanatory range, goodness of fit, and consistency with other models.
  • The cost of a model is influenced by its complexity and the effort needed for its adoption.

Related Experiment Videos

  • MTS presents challenges to the Scientific Evaluation of Theories (SET) framework.
  • Outlook:

    • Further development is needed to quantitatively evaluate the benefit-cost ratio for complex models like MTS.
    • The challenges posed by MTS to SET require further investigation and potential refinement of evaluation methodologies.
    • Future research should focus on establishing robust criteria for assessing the utility and complexity of scientific models.