Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comprehensive evaluation model for nursing education.

S B Reed, W Riley

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |November 8, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    In vitro comparison of two different methods of cell washing.

    Perfusion·2012
    Same author

    Knowledge, attitudes and practices surveys of blood donation in developing countries.

    Vox sanguinis·2012
    Same author

    Role of outer membrane c-type cytochromes MtrC and OmcA in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 cell production, accumulation, and detachment during respiration on hematite.

    Geobiology·2012
    Same author

    Belmont Hyperthermia Pump in the conduct of intra-operative heated chemotherapy.

    Perfusion·2009
    Same author

    Commentary on: Belmont Hyperthermia Pump in the conduct of intraoperative heated chemotherapy.

    Perfusion·2009
    Same author

    Avian mortality events in the United States caused by anticholinesterase pesticides: a retrospective summary of National Wildlife Health Center records from 1980 to 2000.

    Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology·2004
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    This study introduces a flexible evaluation model to guide decisions, questions, and information gathering for comprehensive program assessment. It supports tailored approaches for individual school needs in total program evaluation.

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Research
    • Program Evaluation
    • Systems Analysis

    Background:

    • Effective program evaluation is crucial for educational improvement.
    • Existing evaluation frameworks may lack comprehensive structure and flexibility.
    • Schools require adaptable tools for assessing diverse program aspects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a structured model for program evaluation.
    • To delineate decision-making processes, key questions, and information sources.
    • To offer a flexible framework adaptable to unique school contexts.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a matrix-based evaluation model.
    • Inclusion of decision points, evaluative questions (why), program aspects (what), and stakeholders (who).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on a systematic and comprehensive approach to evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • The model provides a clear structure for evaluation planning.
    • It facilitates the identification of specific evaluation questions and data sources.
    • The framework allows for customization to meet individual school requirements.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed model offers a robust and adaptable system for total program evaluation.
    • Its structured yet flexible nature supports comprehensive assessment and school-specific needs.
    • This model can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of educational program evaluations.