Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A framework for viewing the process of standard setting.

R K Hambleton, S Powell

Evaluation & the Health Professions

|February 10, 1983

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Language matters: Guidance for person-centred diabetes communication in Ireland.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2026

Same author

Impact of COVID-19 on management and outcomes of NHS patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: evidence from a UK registry.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2025

Same author

Barriers and enablers to implementing police mental health co-responder programs: A qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Implementation research and practice·2024

Same author

First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.

Physical review letters·2023

Same author

Perspectives on paediatric sleep-disordered breathing in the UK: a qualitative study.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022

Same author

Behcet's Disease (BD) Presenting as a Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST).

Irish medical journal·2022

Same journal

Signal versus Diagnosis: From Burnout Risk Screening to Care.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026

See all related articles

This study provides essential guidelines for standard-setting groups, focusing on selecting and implementing methods systematically. It addresses key variables and technical challenges in the standards development process.

Area of Science:

Standards Development
Technical Management

Background:

Extensive literature exists on standard-setting issues and methods.
However, practical guidance for standard-setting committees is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide guidelines for standard-setting groups.
To assist in selecting and implementing standard-setting methods systematically.

Main Methods:

Review of standard-setting literature.
Identification of context-setting variables.
Analysis of technical matters in standard-setting.

Main Results:

A framework of context-setting variables is described.
Key technical considerations for method selection and implementation are outlined.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

Systematic approaches are crucial for effective standard-setting.
This work offers practical support for committees developing standards.