Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

User-centered evaluation.

C J Bland, J A Ullian, D G Froberg

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |February 10, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a user-centered approach to improve the utility of graduate medical education evaluations. By focusing on usefulness and clear roles, this method ensures evaluation data effectively informs decision-making.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Stephen Abrahamson, PhD, ScD, educationist: a stranger in a kind of paradise.

    Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2003
    Same author

    Review criteria for research manuscripts.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    Lessons learned from a distance-based consulting program to assist faculty development projects.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    What did we learn about the impact on community-based faculty? Recommendations for recruitment, retention, and rewards.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    The "jamais-vu phenomenon" in medical education.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Program Evaluation

    Background:

    • Extensive literature exists on graduate medical education (GME) and its evaluation.
    • However, the practical application and benefits derived from these evaluations are often overlooked.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a user-centered approach to enhance the utilization of internal evaluation results in GME.
    • To emphasize the utility of data generated from GME evaluations.

    Main Methods:

    • Adapting models for increasing the use of external evaluation information.
    • Implementing a user-centered evaluation framework focusing on data utility.
    • Defining distinct roles for evaluators and decision-makers.
    • Prioritizing communication aspects throughout the evaluation process.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The proposed approach emphasizes usefulness at every step of the evaluation process.
    • Clear delineation of evaluator and decision-maker roles is crucial.
    • Attention to communication enhances the impact of evaluation findings.

    Conclusions:

    • A user-centered approach ensures evaluation provides actionable information for improving daily decisions in GME.
    • This method's success relies on a pervasive attitude of utility and attention to its core features.