Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The performance appraisal process: a model and some testable propositions.

T DeCotiis, A Petit

    Academy of Management Review. Academy of Management
    |June 11, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Enhanced coarsening induced by pore confinement.

    Physical review. E·2025
    Same author

    Fenestration of the vertebral artery in a polytrauma patient: A vascular anatomical variant.

    Journal de medecine vasculaire·2024
    Same author

    Clinical relevance and prognostic impact of the classification between multibacillary and paucibacillary forms of cutaneous tuberculosis: A 24-year retrospective multicenter study.

    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2024
    Same author

    From Delphi consensus to decision algorithm: Ethical considerations.

    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2024
    Same author

    The value of alpha-1 antitrypsin functional testing and genotyping for the diagnosis of the MS variant of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-associated panniculitis.

    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2024
    Same author

    Alternative or complementary Medicines: Whether to work alongside them or reject them outright - an ethical dilemma.

    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2024
    Same journal

    THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN WORK MOTIVATION.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·2006
    Same journal

    The effects of regulatory tools on organizational populations.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1991
    Same journal

    The seasons of a CEO's tenure.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1991
    Same journal

    Reconceptualizing the nature and consequences of part-time work.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1989
    Same journal

    Quasi firms: strategic interorganizational forms in the health care industry.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1988
    Same journal

    A life-cycle model of organizational federations: the case of hospitals.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1987
    See all related articles

    This study presents a model identifying key factors influencing performance rating accuracy. Rater motivation, ability, and clear judgmental norms are crucial for accurate performance evaluations.

    Area of Science:

    • Organizational Psychology
    • Human Resources Management
    • Performance Management

    Background:

    • Accurate performance ratings are essential for fair employee evaluation and development.
    • Existing literature lacks a comprehensive model integrating key determinants of rating accuracy.
    • Understanding these determinants is critical for improving organizational assessment processes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a literature-based model of the determinants of performance rating accuracy.
    • To identify and synthesize the primary factors influencing the precision of performance evaluations.
    • To provide a framework for future research in performance appraisal.

    Main Methods:

    • A comprehensive review and synthesis of existing literature on performance appraisal.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a conceptual model based on identified determinants.
  • Derivation of propositions and research suggestions from the model's components.

    • Main Results:

    • The model identifies three major determinants of performance rating accuracy: rater motivation, rater ability, and the availability of appropriate judgmental norms.
    • Each determinant plays a significant role in the rater's capacity to provide accurate assessments.
    • The interplay between these factors influences the overall fidelity of performance evaluations.

    Conclusions:

    • Rater motivation, ability, and clear judgmental norms are fundamental to achieving accurate performance ratings.
    • Future research should investigate the specific mechanisms through which these determinants impact rating accuracy.
    • Implementing strategies to enhance rater motivation and ability, and establishing clear norms, can improve performance appraisal systems.