Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Process mapping in screening mammography.

G J Whitman1, S L Venable, R L Downs

  • 1Division of Diagnostic Imaging, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Journal of Digital Imaging
|May 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vitrification of Mouse Blastocysts by Open or Closed System and Warming in Sucrose-containing or Sucrose-free Diluent.

Cryo letters·2021
Same author

A feasibility study of neoadjuvant talazoparib for operable breast cancer patients with a germline <i>BRCA</i> mutation demonstrates marked activity.

NPJ breast cancer·2017
Same author

Use of a virtual human performance laboratory to improve integration of mathematics and biology in sports science curricula in Sweden and the United States.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2007
Same author

The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography.

The British journal of radiology·2007
Same author

A functional CD40 receptor is expressed in pancreatic beta cells.

Diabetologia·2005
Same author

Benchmarking graduate health administration programs: stakeholders' perceptions.

The Journal of health administration education·2002
Same journal

Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Imaging Classification: A Promising Solution for Deep Learning Limits in Data Scarcity Scenarios.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Detecting and Characterizing Inferior Vena Cava Filters on Abdominal Computed Tomography with Data-Driven Computational Frameworks.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

DMCA-GAN: Dual Multilevel Constrained Attention GAN for MRI-Based Hippocampus Segmentation.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Left Ventricular Myocardial Dysfunction Evaluation in Thalassemia Patients Using Echocardiographic Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

External Validation of Robust Radiomic Signature to Predict 2-Year Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
See all related articles

Process mapping helps improve screening mammography programs by analyzing each step. This method identifies inefficiencies and problems, aiding in resource allocation and program enhancement for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Healthcare Management
  • Process Improvement

Background:

  • Effective screening mammography programs are crucial for early breast cancer detection.
  • Developing efficient and cost-effective programs requires skilled staff, infrastructure, and technology.
  • Analyzing existing workflows is essential for identifying areas of improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the steps involved in a screening mammography program.
  • To identify potential systemic and personnel issues within the screening process.
  • To provide a framework for improving the design and efficiency of mammography programs.

Main Methods:

  • Process mapping was employed to meticulously examine each stage of the screening mammography workflow.
  • The analysis covered the entire patient journey, from examination request to final consultation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • All potential outcomes at each step were considered.

    • Main Results:

    • Process mapping revealed opportunities for identifying systemic and personnel problems.
    • The technique aids in strategic resource allocation and workplace design.
    • Inefficient components limiting program growth were identified through step-by-step analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Process mapping is a valuable tool for designing and enhancing screening mammography programs.
    • Analyzing the mammography process as a series of steps facilitates the identification of growth limitations.
    • The insights gained can lead to more efficient and effective screening services.