Chaperonin function depends on structure and disorder in co-chaperonin mobile loops

Co-chaperonins from diverse organisms exhibit mobile loops which fold into a beta hairpin conformation upon binding to the chaperonin. GroES, Gp31, and human Hsp10 mobile loops exhibit a preference for the beta hairpin conformation in the free co-chaperonins, and the conformational dynamics of the human Hsp10 mobile loop appear to be restricted by nascent hairpin formation. Backbone conformational entropy must weigh against binding of co-chaperonins to chaperonins, and thus the conformational preferences of the loops may strongly influence chaperonin-binding affinity. Indeed, subtle mutations in the loops change GroEL-binding affinity and cause defects in chaperonin function, and these defects can be suppressed by mutations in GroEL which compensate for the changes in affinity. The fact that high-affinity co-chaperonin binding impairs chaperonin function has implications for the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding.