Related Experiment Videos
Contact laser treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy.
E Montanari1, A Guarneri, F Pozzoni
1Istituto di Urologia, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Italia. EmanueleMontanari@unimi.it
Summary
Contact laser ablation of the prostate (CLAP) effectively treats benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), offering comparable outcomes to traditional TURP. However, higher costs and longer operative times limit its widespread adoption over TURP.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Laser Technology
Background:
- Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is commonly treated with Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).
- Emerging surgical lasers offer potential advantages in perioperative complications, learning curve, and cost-effectiveness.
- Contact laser ablation of the prostate (CLAP) is a laser-based alternative for BPH treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of Contact Laser Ablation of the Prostate (CLAP).
- To compare CLAP outcomes with the established standard treatment, TURP.
- To assess the long-term durability of BPH relief provided by CLAP.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 67 patients with BPH underwent CLAP using a neodynium-YAG or diode laser.
- Preoperative and postoperative assessments included digital rectal examination, transrectal prostatic ultrasound, PSA levels, IPSS, post-voiding residual urine, and maximum flow rate.
- Bladder pressure at maximum flow (Pdet-Qmax) was measured preoperatively and at six months post-procedure.
Main Results:
- CLAP demonstrated significant improvements in IPSS, Qmax, Pdet-Qmax, and PVU compared to baseline.
- Mean operative time was 47.9 minutes, with a mean catheter time of 2.5 days and hospital stay of 4.8 days.
- While efficacious, CLAP incurred 13% higher costs than TURP, with longer operative times and less durable obstruction relief.
Conclusions:
- Contact laser ablation of the prostate is an effective treatment for BPH, comparable to TURP in symptom relief.
- Despite its efficacy, higher costs, longer operative times, and reduced long-term durability impede CLAP from replacing TURP.
- Further research may be needed to optimize laser techniques and cost-effectiveness for BPH management.