Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Volume completion.

P U Tse1

  • 1Harvard University Vision Sciences Lab, USA. ptse@wjh.harvard.edu

Cognitive Psychology
|August 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Amodal completion, where the visual system perceives whole objects from partial views, is not driven by contour relatability. Instead, mergeable volumes, or 3D enclosures, are key to understanding how we complete occluded visual information.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations.

Vision research·2021
Same author

Motion fading is driven by perceived, not actual angular velocity.

Vision research·2010
Same author

Microsaccade directions do not predict directionality of illusory brightness changes of overlapping transparent surfaces.

Vision research·2009
Same author

Motion fading and the motion aftereffect share a common process of neural adaptation.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2009
Same author

Feature mixing rather than feature replacement during perceptual filling-in.

Vision research·2009
Same author

Rotating dotted ellipses: motion perception driven by grouped figural rather than local dot motion signals.

Vision research·2007
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The visual system often completes image fragments into coherent objects, a phenomenon known as amodal completion.
  • Previous theories, such as Kellman and Shipley (1991), proposed that contour relatability dictates amodal completion.
  • Contour relatability was defined by the intersection angle of imaginary contour extensions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the prevailing contour-based account of amodal completion.
  • To propose and investigate a novel volume-based explanation for visual completion phenomena.
  • To demonstrate that contour relatability is not a necessary or sufficient condition for amodal completion.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of visual completion phenomena beyond simple overlapping flat surfaces.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Introduction of the concept of "mergeable volumes" as a critical factor in completion.
  • Definition of mergeable volumes based on relatable unbounded visible surfaces or merging enclosed insides.

    • Main Results:

    • Contour relatability was found to be neither necessary nor sufficient for amodal completion.
    • Mergeable volumes, defined as 3D enclosures, were identified as the critical elements in completion.
    • The proposed volume-based account successfully explains complex completion examples.

    Conclusions:

    • Amodal completion is better explained by the concept of mergeable volumes rather than relatable contours.
    • The volume-based account provides a more comprehensive explanation for visual completion phenomena.
    • Surface completion is a special case within the broader framework of volume-based amodal completion.