Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
Published on: January 14, 2014
Determinants of echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass in diabetic patients with or without silent
R N Sachs1, P Valensi, B Lormeau
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinique du Vert Galant, Tremblay en France, France. paul.valensi@jvr.ap-hop-paris.fr
Insights
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is common in diabetic patients. The factors influencing left ventricular mass index (LVMI) vary based on silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) and coronary stenoses presence.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diabetology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a significant independent risk factor for cardiovascular events.
- Diabetic patients often present with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and may have undiagnosed coronary artery disease.
- Understanding the determinants of LVH in this population is crucial for risk stratification and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the factors determining left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in diabetic patients.
- To analyze these determinants in relation to the presence or absence of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI).
- To assess diabetic patients with at least two cardiovascular risk factors but no known coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography was used to measure LVMI in 80 diabetic patients (14 Type 1, 66 Type 2).
- Three non-invasive tests were employed: ECG stress test, thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy with dipyridamole, and 48-h ambulatory ECG monitoring.
- Coronary angiography was performed in select cases to assess for significant coronary stenoses.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was prevalent, found in 45% of patients.
- Silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) was detected in 37% of patients; 7 had significant coronary stenoses.
- LVMI was higher with coronary stenoses and correlated with systolic blood pressure. In SMI-free patients, LVMI correlated with creatininemia. In SMI patients with normal coronaries, LVMI correlated with waist/hip ratio, albuminuria, and red blood cell filtration index.
Conclusions:
- LVH is highly frequent in diabetic patients.
- The primary determinants of increased LVMI differ based on SMI and coronary stenosis status.
- Volume load, microcirculatory disorders, and blood pressure are key factors influencing LVMI in diabetic patients with varying degrees of ischemic heart disease.
Abstract:
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a recognized independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of left ventricular mass index (LVMI), according to the presence or absence of silent myocardial ischaemia (SMI), in diabetic patients with at least two additional risk factors but with no known coronary artery disease. Eighty diabetic patients (14 Type 1 and 66 Type 2) were studied, and LVMI was measured echocardiographically. Three non-invasive tests (the ECG stress test, thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy with intravenous dipyridamole infusion, and ambulatory 48-h ECG monitoring) were performed on all patients. Forty-five percent of patients had LVH (LVMI > or = 110 g/m2 in men and > or = 106 g/m2 in women). Twenty-six patients (37%) had SMI assessed on at least one of the non-invasive tests, 7 of whom had significant coronary stenoses on angiography. LVMI was significantly higher in patients with coronary stenoses on angiography than in those with SMI but without coronary stenoses or in those without SMI (p < 0.05), and was correlated with systolic blood pressure. In patients free of SMI, LVMI correlated with creatininemia. In patients with SMI and normal coronary arteries on angiography, LVMI correlated with the waist/hip girth ratio, the log urinary albumin excretion rate and the red blood cell filtration index (a rigidity index). This study suggests that LVH is very frequent in diabetic patients and that the main factor contributing to the increase of LVMI differs according to the presence or absence of SMI and coronary stenoses: volume load in patients free of SMI, microcirculatory disorders in those with SMI but with normal coronary arteries, and blood pressure in those with coronary stenoses.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

