Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Defining responsibility for screening.

R Sifri1, R Wender

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|August 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Patient care involves multiple doctors, leading to confusion over cancer screening responsibilities. This study clarifies generalist and specialist roles to improve screening effectiveness and patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of increased postoperative opioid administration with non-small-cell lung cancer recurrence: a retrospective analysis.

British journal of anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Diabetologia·2012
Same author

Awake insertion of the fibreoptic intubating LMA CTrach in three morbidly obese patients with potentially difficult airways.

Anaesthesia·2007
Same author

Use of cancer susceptibility testing among primary care physicians.

Clinical genetics·2003
Same author

Metabolic substrates other than glucose support axon function in central white matter.

Journal of neuroscience research·2001
Same author

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2001
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Fragmented patient care among multiple providers often leads to suboptimal cancer screening recommendations.
  • Effective cancer screening involves a complex process from initial discussion to follow-up, requiring clear responsibility.
  • Ambiguity in generalist and specialist physician roles can hinder public cancer screening performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the distinct approaches of generalist and specialist physicians in cancer screening.
  • To describe care models that promote shared responsibility for screening processes.
  • To suggest strategies for enhancing physician communication to optimize cancer screening rates.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of generalist and specialist screening practices.
  • Review of existing care models for shared responsibility in screening.
  • Identification of communication strategies to improve screening performance.

Main Results:

  • Generalists and specialists exhibit different screening methodologies and patient engagement styles.
  • Models facilitating shared responsibility can improve screening continuity and adherence.
  • Enhanced inter-physician communication is crucial for maximizing screening uptake and follow-through.

Conclusions:

  • Defining clear roles for generalists and specialists is essential for effective cancer screening.
  • Implementing shared responsibility models and improving communication can significantly enhance screening performance.
  • Optimizing the screening process requires a collaborative approach between all healthcare providers involved in patient care.

Related Experiment Videos