Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disambiguating different covariation types

Brody1

  • 1Lab 126, Instituto de Fisiologia Celular S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-523 C.P. 04510, Lab 126, Mexico DF 04510 MEXICO. cbrody@ifcsun1.ifisiol.unam. mx.

Neural Computation
|September 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correlations without synchrony

Neural computation·1999
Same author

Correction to "Modulation of oncogenic potential by alternative gene use in human prostate cancer"

Nature medicine·1999
Same author

Geometry of Quantum Statistical Inference.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Simultaneous Multislice Rapid (SMR) FLASH MRI with Hard Pulse Excitation

Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B·1996
Same author

Minimum decision cost for quantum ensembles.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Brain Mediation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms: Evidence From Functional Brain Imaging Studies in the Human and Nonhuman Primate.

Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry·1996
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Neuronal excitability and latency variations can mimic spike timing synchronization in spike train covariograms. This study presents methods to isolate these effects, improving analysis of neural synchrony.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Quantitative Biology

Background:

  • Spike train covariograms are used to analyze neural synchrony.
  • Covariations in neuronal excitability or latency can create artifactual peaks in covariograms, resembling true synchrony.
  • Distinguishing true synchrony from these artifacts is crucial for accurate interpretation of neural circuit function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop quantitative methods for dissecting contributions to spike train covariograms.
  • To differentiate synchrony-related peaks from those caused by neuronal excitability or latency variations.
  • To provide tools for more precise analysis of neural communication.

Main Methods:

  • A method to estimate and subtract the excitability component of a covariogram using trial-by-trial excitability data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A method to assess the potential contribution of latency covariations to the observed covariogram.
  • Application of these methods to spike train data.

    • Main Results:

    • The excitability component can be quantitatively estimated and removed from covariograms.
    • The remaining covariogram components can be further analyzed for latency-driven effects.
    • These methods allow for a clearer distinction between synchrony and other sources of covariation.

    Conclusions:

    • Neuronal excitability and latency variations are significant confounders in spike train synchrony analysis.
    • The presented quantitative methods effectively isolate and identify these confounding factors.
    • Accurate assessment of neural synchrony requires accounting for neuronal excitability and latency dynamics.