Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Correlations without synchrony

Brody1

  • 1Lab 126, Instituto de Fisiologia Celular S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-523 C.P. 04510, Lab 126, Mexico DF 04510 MEXICO. cbrody@ifcsun1.ifisiol.unam. mx.

Neural Computation
|September 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disambiguating different covariation types

Neural computation·1999
Same author

Correction to "Modulation of oncogenic potential by alternative gene use in human prostate cancer"

Nature medicine·1999
Same author

Geometry of Quantum Statistical Inference.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Simultaneous Multislice Rapid (SMR) FLASH MRI with Hard Pulse Excitation

Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B·1996
Same author

Minimum decision cost for quantum ensembles.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Brain Mediation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms: Evidence From Functional Brain Imaging Studies in the Human and Nonhuman Primate.

Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry·1996
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Spike train correlogram peaks may not always indicate neural synchronization. Alternative explanations like response latency or neuronal excitability variations can produce similar peaks, complicating interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Neural Coding

Background:

  • Spike train correlograms are commonly used to infer neural synchronization.
  • Peaks in correlograms typically suggest synchronized firing patterns between neurons.
  • However, non-independence of spike trains can also generate peaks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate alternative explanations for peaks in spike train correlograms.
  • To differentiate between true spike timing synchronization and other sources of correlation.
  • To analyze how response latency and neuronal excitability covariations affect correlogram peaks.

Main Methods:

  • Describing two biologically plausible mechanisms that generate correlogram peaks.
  • Analyzing peak shapes generated by latency and excitability interactions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing these peaks to those indicative of spike timing synchronization.

    • Main Results:

    • Peaks in correlograms can arise from non-independent spike trains, not just synchronization.
    • Covariations in response latency and neuronal excitability can produce peaks similar to spike timing synchronization.
    • Interpreting correlogram peaks can be ambiguous due to these alternative explanations.

    Conclusions:

    • Correlogram peaks alone are insufficient evidence for spike timing synchronization.
    • Response latency and neuronal excitability variations are plausible confounders in interpreting neural synchrony.
    • Distinguishing true synchrony from these interactions is crucial for accurate neural coding analysis.