Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endoscopic databases and outcomes research.

G M Eisen1

  • 1Department of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee--Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
|September 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Small-bowel endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2012
Same author

Small-bowel endoscopy.

Endoscopy·2012
Same author

MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2011
Same author

Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2010
Same author

Does level of sedation impact detection of advanced neoplasia?

Digestive diseases and sciences·2010
Same author

Small bowel mucosal injury is reduced in healthy subjects treated with celecoxib compared with ibuprofen plus omeprazole, as assessed by video capsule endoscopy.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2007
Same journal

Transform-The Path Forward: Endoscopy and the Science of Expertise.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Ushering in a New Era of Training in Endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Where Do We Go from Here: Transforming Teaching Endoscopy Knowledge Using the Expert Performance Approach.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Endoscopy Training.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

From Expert to Educator: Translating Expert Performance into Teachable Competencies Through Trainer Development in Endoscopic Simulation.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Implementing Endoscopy Simulation Nationally.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Endoscopic databases are crucial for patient outcomes but face data collection challenges. Standardizing terminology and understanding available tools are key for effective clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Data Management

Background:

  • Endoscopic databases are vital for evaluating patient-centered outcomes in clinical practice.
  • Various formats and structures exist for endoscopic databases.
  • Effective data collection and utilization are essential for improving patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss obstacles encountered in endoscopic data collection.
  • To highlight the importance of standardized endoscopic terminology and content.
  • To review the strengths and weaknesses of current endoscopic databases.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of information on endoscopic databases.
  • Analysis of challenges in data acquisition and standardization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Overview of existing endoscopic database systems available to clinicians.

    • Main Results:

    • Data collection for endoscopic databases faces significant hurdles.
    • A standardized approach to endoscopic terminology and content is crucial for data integrity.
    • Existing endoscopic databases offer varying degrees of utility, with distinct advantages and limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Overcoming data collection obstacles is necessary for maximizing the value of endoscopic databases.
    • Standardization efforts are paramount for consistent and reliable endoscopic data.
    • Clinicians should be aware of the available endoscopic database options to support patient-centered outcomes.