Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Faulty judgment, expert opinion, and decision-making capacity.

M Silberfeld1, D Checkland

  • 1Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, ON, Canada. michel.silberfeld@utoronto.ca

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|November 5, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Assessing decision-making capacity requires bridging an inferential gap between specific abilities and legal standards. Current methods often fail due to insufficient expertise in understanding diagnostic influences on capacity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New Directions in Assessing Mental Competence: How the concept of limited guardianship has changed the meaning of competence.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

On risk and decisional capacity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment.

Journal of general internal medicine·1999
Same author

Approaches to capacity and competency: the Canadian view.

International journal of law and psychiatry·1997
Same author

Permissible errors in managing property: an approach to the threshold of capacity.

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1996
Same author

Bathing incompetent patients.

The Canadian nurse·1996

Area of Science:

  • Legal Psychology
  • Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Forensic Psychiatry

Background:

  • Decision-making capacity assessments are crucial for determining legal competence.
  • A significant inferential gap exists between clinical capacity criteria and legal standards.
  • Causal influences on decision-making capacity are often not adequately addressed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the inferential gap in decision-making capacity assessments.
  • To illustrate how diagnostic information is used in capacity evaluations.
  • To clarify the expertise needed for valid capacity assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a published case study involving depression.
  • Examination of faulty judgments in capacity assessments.
Keywords:
Mental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of diagnostic information use in legal contexts.

    • Main Results:

    • Assessors frequently fail to bridge the inferential gap using diagnostic information.
    • Faulty judgments highlight challenges in understanding diagnostic causal influences.
    • Lack of expertise leads to abandonment of capacity assessment requirements.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing requisite expertise is essential for justified legal policy on decision-making capacity.
    • A multidisciplinary approach is proposed for long-term development of this expertise.
    • Enhanced expertise is necessary to ensure protective interventions are legally sound.