Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

08:30
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
Published on: February 15, 2015
Permissible errors in managing property: an approach to the threshold of capacity
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario. michel.silberfeld@utoronto.ca
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie
|October 1, 1996
Summary
This study introduces a permissible error approach to clearly define mental capacity thresholds. This method effectively identifies capacity for managing property by analyzing errors in assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Legal Medicine
Background:
- Assessing mental capacity is crucial for legal and medical decisions.
- Current methods may lack explicit thresholds for determining capacity.
- Functional performance is increasingly emphasized in capacity evaluations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a practical method for defining the threshold of mental capacity.
- To establish an explicit approach for evaluating capacity to manage property.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 62 cases.
- Evaluation of assessments for capacity to manage property.
- Recording the type and frequency of errors in assessments.
Main Results:
- The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) did not show clear demarcation for capacity.
- Clinical criteria demonstrated specific items that effectively distinguished capable from incapable individuals.
- Analysis focused on identifying patterns of errors in property management capacity assessments.
Conclusions:
- The permissible error approach provides an explicit threshold for mental capacity.
- This method aligns with the focus on functional performance in capacity evaluations.
- The approach offers a practical tool for clinicians and legal professionals in capacity assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

