Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Integrating performance measure data into the Joint Commission accreditation process.

B I Braun1, R G Koss, J M Loeb

  • 1Health Services Research, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181, USA. bbraun@jcaho.org

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The adoption of smoke-free hospital campuses in the United States.

Tobacco control·2009
Same author

Adverse-event-reporting practices by US hospitals: results of a national survey.

Quality & safety in health care·2008
Same author

Impact of hospital care on incidence of bloodstream infection: the evaluation of processes and indicators in infection control study.

Emerging infectious diseases·2001
Same author

Comparison of clinical indicators for performance measurement of health care quality: a cautionary note.

Clinical performance and quality health care·2001
Same author

The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts.

Texas medicine·2000
Same author

Patient safety is not an oxymoron.

Ambulatory outreach·2000
Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
See all related articles

The Joint Commission integrated performance measurement data into its accreditation process through evolving initiatives like IMSystem and ORYX. This strategic shift enhances healthcare quality assessment and organizational accountability.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Administration
  • Quality Improvement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The Joint Commission's accreditation process has evolved to include performance measurement.
  • Early systems like IMSystem were developed in the late 1980s.
  • The ORYX initiative (1995) introduced flexibility in performance measurement selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the implementation, experience, and results of integrating performance data into accreditation.
  • To outline the evolution of performance measurement strategies.
  • To assess the impact on healthcare quality and accountability.

Main Methods:

  • Description of Joint Commission's implementation plans and evolving strategies.
  • Review of feedback from accredited healthcare organizations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of technical and political challenges encountered.

    • Main Results:

    • Gradual integration of performance measurement into the accreditation process.
    • Increased organizational flexibility and focus on self-improvement via ORYX.
    • Recent evolution towards standardized core measures for valid and reliable assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Performance measurement is increasingly integral to healthcare accreditation.
    • These initiatives advance comprehensive organizational quality assessment.
    • The Joint Commission's approach fosters accountability and continuous improvement.