Related Experiment Videos
[A comparative study of body temperature using rectal and tympanic measurement]
1Service de médecine interne, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Summary
Tympanic thermometers are easy to use but not sensitive enough for accurate fever detection. Rectal temperature measurements are more reliable for identifying fever in internal medicine patients.
Area of Science:
- Internal Medicine
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Thermometry
Background:
- Tympanic temperature measurement is increasingly utilized in clinical settings.
- Its accuracy in internal medicine services requires thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of tympanic temperature measurement compared to rectal temperature.
- To evaluate the reliability of various tympanic thermometers in detecting fever.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of rectal and tympanic temperatures in 37 patients.
- Assessment of tympanic temperatures by two independent examiners.
- Evaluation of ten different tympanic thermometers across hospital departments.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found between left and right ear tympanic temperatures or between examiners.
- A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was observed between average tympanic (36.88°C) and rectal (37.36°C) temperatures.
- The correlation coefficient between tympanic and rectal temperatures was low (0.77).
- Tympanic thermometers detected only 29% of febrile patients (Kappa = 0.406), underestimating high fevers.
- Variability in readings was noted among different tympanic thermometer models.
Conclusions:
- Tympanic temperature measurement is a convenient method but lacks sufficient sensitivity for accurate fever detection.
- Rectal temperature measurement remains a more reliable indicator for identifying fever in internal medicine settings.