Related Experiment Videos
Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus
1El-Maghraby Eye Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ophthalmology
|January 27, 2000
Summary
Fluid deep lamellar keratoplasty offers a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus, avoiding rejection complications. While technically challenging, this modified technique shows promising visual outcomes for patients.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Vision Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive corneal ectasia leading to vision impairment.
- Traditional penetrating keratoplasty carries risks of rejection and requires long-term immunosuppression.
- Deep lamellar keratoplasty aims to preserve host endothelium, potentially reducing rejection rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified fluid-assisted deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLK) technique for treating keratoconus.
- To assess visual outcomes and complication rates associated with this novel DLK approach.
Main Methods:
- A noncomparative case series involving 26 eyes of 25 patients with moderate to advanced keratoconus.
- The modified DLK technique involved intrastromal balanced salt solution injection for corneal dissection, followed by suturing a full-thickness graft (without endothelium/Descemet's membrane).
- Outcomes were assessed using spectacle-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, and intraocular pressure measurements.
Main Results:
- Two cases (8.4%) required conversion to penetrating keratoplasty due to intraoperative perforation.
- In the 24 successful DLK cases, visual acuity improved significantly: 79% achieved >20/50 at 3 months, 87.5% achieved >20/40 at 6 months, and 95.8% achieved 20/30 or better by 1 year post-suture removal.
- Only one eye (4.2%) developed interface irregular astigmatism, successfully managed with contact lenses.
Conclusions:
- Fluid-assisted DLK is a safe and effective surgical option for keratoconus, particularly in bilateral cases, as it eliminates the risk of endothelial rejection.
- The procedure is technically demanding and associated with a slower visual rehabilitation period compared to other techniques.
- This modified DLK technique demonstrates good visual outcomes and a low rate of significant complications.