Related Experiment Videos
Adult psychopathology: issues and controversies
1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0044, USA. widiger@pop.uky.edu
Annual Review of Psychology
|February 7, 2001
Summary
This review highlights challenges in defining mental disorders, emphasizing the need to differentiate normal from abnormal psychological functioning. It suggests dimensional models may improve psychopathology classification.
Area of Science:
- Psychopathology
- Mental Health Research
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Current research inadequately differentiates normal from abnormal psychological functioning.
- The boundaries between mental and physical disorders remain problematic.
- Neurophysiological models are increasingly emphasized in psychopathology research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review issues and controversies surrounding the construct of mental disorder.
- To examine models of etiology and pathology in psychopathology.
- To discuss domains of psychopathology and diagnostic boundaries.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing research and theoretical frameworks.
- Analysis of conceptual issues in defining mental disorders.
- Discussion of the role of neurophysiological and psychological models.
Main Results:
- Inadequate attention to differentiating normal and abnormal psychological functioning.
- Problematic boundaries exist between mental and physical disorders.
- Overemphasis on neurophysiological models may neglect psychological perspectives.
Conclusions:
- A clearer conceptualization of mental disorder is fundamental to psychopathology.
- Dimensional models offer a more precise approach to classifying psychopathology.
- Integrating neurophysiological and psychological models is crucial for advancing the field.