Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using wound care algorithms: a content validation study.

J M Beitz1, L van Rijswijk

  • 1School of Nursing, LaSalle University, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.

Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing : Official Publication of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
|May 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining one-session treatment with a homework program including app-based technology to enhance the treatment of childhood specific phobias: A study protocol of a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2024
Same author

Ingredient-based wound dressing classification: a paradigm that is passé and in need of replacement.

Journal of wound care·2006
Same author

Developing critical thinking with active learning strategies.

Nurse educator·2005
Same author

Clinical inference of nursing students concerning harmful outcomes after medication errors.

Nurse educator·2002
Same author

Documentation with MDS Section M: Skin Condition.

Advances in skin & wound care·2002
Same author

To provide good care, you have to get in the game.

Ostomy/wound management·2002
Same journal

Wounds of the Body, Wounds of the Self: Addressing Shame in the Care of Patients Living With Obesity and Chronic Wounds.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same journal

The Canadian Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (CPIAP).

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same journal

Peristomal Pyoderma Gangrenosum Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Study.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same journal

Isolating 2 Connected Wounds With the Paste Cork Technique: A Case Study.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same journal

Controlling Maceration in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Scoping Review.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same journal

Draining Urinary Sediments Through Conventional Eyelet Catheters and New Intermittent Micro-Hole Zone Catheters.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
See all related articles

This study found wound care algorithms to be valid, but inconsistent definitions for wound assessment and care limit their optimal use. Further research is needed to develop reliable wound care tools for nurses.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Wound Care
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Optimal wound care is hindered by a lack of valid and reliable heuristic devices.
  • Wound care decision-making processes require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Establish content validation data for wound care algorithms.
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses of existing wound care algorithms.
  • Gain insight into the wound care decision-making process.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study involving 44 registered nurse wound care experts.
  • Survey and interviews using an 83-item, 4-point Likert-type scale.
  • Qualitative analysis of transcribed participant comments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Wound care algorithms demonstrated overall validity (Content Validity Index = 0.86).
  • Individual expert validity scores were high (34/44 > 0.8).
  • Lower scores were noted for algorithms related to deep wound packing; qualitative data revealed issues with assessment/care definitions.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated wound care algorithms are valid instruments.
  • Lack of standardized, reliable definitions for wound assessment and care impedes optimal algorithm utilization.
  • Further research and development of evidence-based algorithms are recommended to enhance nursing practice in wound care.