Related Experiment Videos
Case management for people with severe mental disorders.
M Marshall1, A Gray, A Lockwood
1Department of Community Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Academic Unit, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire, UK, PR2 4HT. Max.Marshall@man.ac.uk.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|May 5, 2000
Summary
Case management increases patient contact with psychiatric services but also raises hospital admission rates. Evidence suggests it offers questionable value for severe mental illness care, with no significant improvements in clinical or social outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Mental Health Services Research
- Health Services Management
Background:
- Deinstitutionalization since the 1960s led to community-based care for severe mental illness.
- Rising readmission rates indicated potential limitations in standard community care models.
- Case management emerged in the 1970s to coordinate community-based care for severely mentally ill individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of case management for severely mentally ill individuals in community settings.
- To compare case management against standard care across key outcomes: service contact, hospital admissions, clinical/social functioning, and costs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through extensive electronic database searches (CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, SCISEARCH).
- Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs comparing case management to standard community care for adults (18-65) with severe mental disorders.
- Data extraction and analysis involved categorical and continuous data, with reliability testing and heterogeneity assessments.
Main Results:
- Case management increased patient contact with psychiatric services (OR 0.70).
- Hospital admission rates were approximately doubled with case management (OR 1.84).
- No significant advantages were found for case management over standard care in psychiatric or social outcomes, except for compliance in one study. Cost data were inconclusive.
Conclusions:
- Case management improves service contact but increases hospital admissions and potentially costs.
- Current evidence does not support case management as a clinically significant improvement over standard care for severe mental illness.
- The overall value of case management is questionable, challenging its role as a cornerstone of community mental health services.