Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?

J N Amoore1, D H Scott

  • 1Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK. John.Amoore@ed.ac.uk

Blood Pressure Monitoring
|June 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Simulators can identify variations within the same non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitor model but struggle to detect differences between distinct NIBP models due to dissimilar pulse generation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New Races of Phytophthora sojae with Rps1-d Virulence.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

A mottled-leaf character in winter squash; inherited as a dominant Mendelian character.

The Journal of heredity·2010
Same author

Auditing the technology used to measure blood pressure.

Journal of medical engineering & technology·2010
Same author

Insertion of Equanox probe into terminal outlet for nitrous oxide with consequent hypoxia.

Anaesthesia·2010
Same author

Ultrasound guidance for internal jugular vein catheterization.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2001
Same author

Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect apodization on spatial visual performance with decentered pupils.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology
  • Clinical Monitoring

Background:

  • Oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors rely on model-specific algorithms for arterial pressure estimation.
  • Clinical evaluation of each NIBP monitor model's accuracy is essential.
  • The utility of simulators in assisting NIBP monitor evaluations requires verification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if simulators can effectively identify systematic discrepancies between different NIBP monitors.
  • To assess the capability of simulators in distinguishing between algorithms, detecting calibration errors, and comparing monitor models.

Main Methods:

  • Tested simulator's ability to differentiate between two algorithms within a single NIBP monitor model.
  • Evaluated simulator's capacity to detect calibration errors at various pressure points.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared simulator-based assessments with clinical findings for same-model and different-model NIBP devices.

    • Main Results:

    • Simulators accurately detected specified systolic and diastolic differences between two algorithms of the Nellcor N-3100 monitor.
    • Calibration adjustments were successfully identified by simulators across different pressure settings.
    • Simulator and clinical comparisons showed agreement for same-model devices but inconsistency for different NIBP models.
    • Simulators generated oscillometric pulse shapes that differed from physiological recordings.

    Conclusions:

    • Simulators are effective in revealing systematic differences between NIBP devices of the same model.
    • Simulators are not reliable for detecting systematic differences between different NIBP models.
    • Dissimilarities between simulator-generated and physiologically recorded pulses may contribute to the limitations of simulator-based evaluations for diverse NIBP models.