Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

06:04
Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
Published on: March 6, 2018
[Clinical study of transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia using a thick loop (VaporTome)]
M Yajima1, K Baba, N Yanagisawa
1Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine.
Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica
|June 9, 2000
Summary
Transurethral surgery using VaporTome significantly improved symptoms and quality of life for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. This minimally invasive procedure demonstrated high efficacy and safety with minimal complications.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men.
- Symptomatic BPH significantly impacts quality of life and urinary function.
- Traditional treatments like transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) carry risks and costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral surgery using VaporTome for symptomatic BPH.
- To assess the impact of VaporTome on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak flow rate (PFR), prostate volume, and residual urine.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 23 patients with symptomatic BPH.
- Transurethral surgery was performed using a VaporTome device.
- Clinical outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operation.
Main Results:
- Significant reductions in mean IPSS (22.6 to 5.3), QoL index (5.5 to 1.2), prostate volume (66.9 to 18.2 ml), and residual urine (167.9 to 20.4 ml).
- Significant increase in mean PFR (6.2 to 17.4 ml/sec).
- High overall efficacy rates: 80.9% at 1 month, peaking at 94.7% at 6 months, and 85.8% at 12 months. No serious complications were reported.
Conclusions:
- Transurethral surgery with VaporTome is an effective and safe treatment for symptomatic BPH.
- The procedure offers advantages of high efficacy, minimal morbidity, and potentially lower costs compared to TURP and other minimally invasive options.

