Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Making science in a fractal landscape.

¹Laboratoire d'Analyse Ultrastructurale, Bâtiment de Biologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. jacques.dubochet@lau.unil.ch

Micron (Oxford, England : 1993)

|July 20, 2000

Summary

Public trust in science has shifted, prompting scientists to better justify their work. A new social contract emphasizing knowledge, tolerance, and transparency is needed to rebuild public support for scientific advancement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cryo-EM--the first thirty years.

Journal of microscopy·2012

Same author

Comparison of different methods for thin section EM analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Journal of microscopy·2010

Same author

Compression and crevasses in vitreous sections under different cutting conditions.

Journal of microscopy·2008

Same author

Cryoelectron microscopy of vitrified sections: a new challenge for the analysis of functional nuclear architecture.

Histochemistry and cell biology·2005

Same author

An oscillating cryo-knife reduces cutting-induced deformation of vitreous ultrathin sections.

Journal of microscopy·2003

Same author

Cryo-negative staining reduces electron-beam sensitivity of vitrified biological particles.

Journal of structural biology·2002

Area of Science:

Sociology of Science
Science Communication

Background:

Historically, scientific progress was widely accepted as beneficial, enjoying strong public support.
This era of unquestioning public trust has ended, with society now demanding clear justifications for scientific endeavors.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the evolving relationship between science and society.
To highlight the need for scientists to articulate the societal value of their research.
To propose a framework for a renewed social contract between science and the public.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of the historical and current relationship between science and society.
Review of public perception and trust in scientific institutions.
Philosophical examination of the ethical and social responsibilities of scientists.

Main Results:

A significant decline in automatic public support for science has occurred.
Scientists are often unprepared to effectively communicate the societal benefits of their work.
The existing social contract between science and society is no longer adequate.

Conclusions:

A new social contract is essential for the future of science.
This contract must be founded on principles of knowledge, tolerance, and transparency.
Proactive and clear communication by scientists is crucial for maintaining public trust and support.

Related Experiment Videos