Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing the predictive validity of DUI risk screening instruments: development of validation standards.

B J Anderson1, R W Snow, E Wells-Parker

  • 1Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)
|August 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that inconsistent evaluation standards can lead to inaccurate conclusions about the effectiveness of driving under the influence (DUI) screening tools. New standards are proposed for accurate risk prediction instrument comparisons.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Justification Of Empiric Methodology to Determine Dexmedetomidine Dose for the TREX Study.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2022
Same author

The Identification and Treatment of Common Skin Infections.

Journal of athletic training·2022
Same author

Can we use local climate zones for predicting malaria prevalence across sub-Saharan African cities?

Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site]·2022
Same author

Determining EMIC Wave Vector Properties Through Multi-Point Measurements: The Wave Curl Analysis.

Journal of geophysical research. Space physics·2021
Same author

Time spent outside of target glucose range for young children with type 1 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitor study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2020
Same author

EMIC Waves in the Outer Magnetosphere: Observations of an Off-Equator Source Region.

Geophysical research letters·2019

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Substance Abuse Research
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Driving under the influence (DUI) screening instruments are crucial for assessing recidivism risk.
  • Previous validations of these instruments may be compromised by varying base rates and selection ratios.
  • Lack of standardized evaluation methods hinders reliable comparisons of instrument efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive efficacy of established DUI screening instruments.
  • To demonstrate how base rate variations and selection ratios influence efficacy assessments.
  • To develop robust evaluation standards for risk prediction instruments.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed data from 4815 DUI offenders.
  • Examined the impact of base rates and selection ratios on traditional predictive efficacy measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared the predictive performance of 10 previously validated DUI instruments.
  • Introduced a novel measure of predictive efficacy less sensitive to base rate and selection ratio variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Three instruments consistently performed well at specific thresholds.
    • Different evaluation standards yielded significantly divergent conclusions on instrument efficacy.
    • Established new standards for validating risk prediction instruments based on the analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • Failure to apply uniform evaluation standards can result in erroneous conclusions about the relative predictive efficacy of risk assessment tools.
    • The developed standards aim to ensure valid and equivalent comparisons of risk prediction instruments.
    • Standardized evaluation is essential for accurate risk assessment in DUI populations.