Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Memory and judgment: availability versus explanation-based accounts.

M B Wolfe1, N Pennington

  • 1University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. mike.wolfe@vanderbilt.edu

Memory & Cognition
|August 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient evaluation of outpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis service following lower limb injuries using a developed validated questionnaire.

Journal of perioperative practice·2015
Same author

The impact of surgeon handedness in total hip replacement.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2014
Same author

The cost of outpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following lower limb injuries.

The bone & joint journal·2013
Same author

A national survey of acute hospitals in England on their current practice in the use of femoral nerve blocks when splinting femoral fractures.

Injury·2011
Same author

Reasoning in explanation-based decision making.

Cognition·1993
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Memory organization influences decisions, with coherent evidence leading to stronger verdicts even when recall is equalized. This research explores memory

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Two theories explain the memory-decision link: explanation-based (memory organization) and availability (information recall amount).
  • Understanding how memory influences legal judgments is crucial for legal psychology and decision-making research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the roles of memory organization (coherence) and information availability in decision-making.
  • To differentiate between explanation-based and availability models in the context of legal evidence evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants evaluated legal trial evidence presented in varying orders (manipulating coherence) and provided verdicts and recall data.
  • Experiment 2: Manipulated evidence order to equate recall of prosecution and defense evidence, isolating the effect of coherence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 showed that coherent prosecution evidence led to more guilty verdicts and greater recall of that evidence.
  • Experiment 2 demonstrated that verdict effects favoring coherent evidence persisted even when recall amounts were balanced across conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence coherence, reflecting an explanation-based memory organization, significantly impacts decisions, independent of simple information availability.
  • Findings support the importance of how information is structured in memory for decision-making, particularly in legal contexts.